1. 30 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  2. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 25 10月, 2016 2 次提交
    • C
      dma-buf: Rename struct fence to dma_fence · f54d1867
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
      and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
      operations to make room.
      
      A consensus was reached in
      https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
      that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
      Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
      remains a good thing!
      
      (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
      v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
      v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel
      
      coccinelle script:
      @@
      
      @@
      - struct fence
      + struct dma_fence
      @@
      
      @@
      - struct fence_ops
      + struct dma_fence_ops
      @@
      
      @@
      - struct fence_cb
      + struct dma_fence_cb
      @@
      
      @@
      - struct fence_array
      + struct dma_fence_array
      @@
      
      @@
      - enum fence_flag_bits
      + enum dma_fence_flag_bits
      @@
      
      @@
      (
      - fence_init
      + dma_fence_init
      |
      - fence_release
      + dma_fence_release
      |
      - fence_free
      + dma_fence_free
      |
      - fence_get
      + dma_fence_get
      |
      - fence_get_rcu
      + dma_fence_get_rcu
      |
      - fence_put
      + dma_fence_put
      |
      - fence_signal
      + dma_fence_signal
      |
      - fence_signal_locked
      + dma_fence_signal_locked
      |
      - fence_default_wait
      + dma_fence_default_wait
      |
      - fence_add_callback
      + dma_fence_add_callback
      |
      - fence_remove_callback
      + dma_fence_remove_callback
      |
      - fence_enable_sw_signaling
      + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
      |
      - fence_is_signaled_locked
      + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
      |
      - fence_is_signaled
      + dma_fence_is_signaled
      |
      - fence_is_later
      + dma_fence_is_later
      |
      - fence_later
      + dma_fence_later
      |
      - fence_wait_timeout
      + dma_fence_wait_timeout
      |
      - fence_wait_any_timeout
      + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
      |
      - fence_wait
      + dma_fence_wait
      |
      - fence_context_alloc
      + dma_fence_context_alloc
      |
      - fence_array_create
      + dma_fence_array_create
      |
      - to_fence_array
      + to_dma_fence_array
      |
      - fence_is_array
      + dma_fence_is_array
      |
      - trace_fence_emit
      + trace_dma_fence_emit
      |
      - FENCE_TRACE
      + DMA_FENCE_TRACE
      |
      - FENCE_WARN
      + DMA_FENCE_WARN
      |
      - FENCE_ERR
      + DMA_FENCE_ERR
      )
       (
       ...
       )
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
      Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      f54d1867
    • G
      drm/amdgpu: fix sched fence slab teardown · a053fb7e
      Grazvydas Ignotas 提交于
      To free fences, call_rcu() is used, which calls amd_sched_fence_free()
      after a grace period. During teardown, there is no guarantee all
      callbacks have finished, so sched_fence_slab may be destroyed before
      all fences have been freed. If we are lucky, this results in some slab
      warnings, if not, we get a crash in one of rcu threads because callback
      is called after amdgpu has already been unloaded.
      
      Fix it with a rcu_barrier().
      
      Fixes: 189e0fb7 ("drm/amdgpu: RCU protected amd_sched_fence_release")
      Acked-by: NChunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGrazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      a053fb7e
  5. 20 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 30 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2016 15 次提交
  8. 05 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 03 5月, 2016 6 次提交
  10. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 15 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  12. 05 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 03 12月, 2015 2 次提交
  14. 24 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  15. 17 11月, 2015 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/amdgpu: fix incorrect mutex usage v3 · e2840221
      Christian König 提交于
      Before this patch the scheduler fence was created when we push the job
      into the queue, so we could only get the fence after pushing it.
      
      The mutex now was necessary to prevent the thread pushing the jobs to
      the hardware from running faster than the thread pushing the jobs into
      the queue.
      
      Otherwise the thread pushing jobs into the queue would have accessed
      possible freed up memory when it tries to get a reference to the fence.
      
      So what you get in the end is thread A:
      mutex_lock(&job->lock);
      ...
      Kick of thread B.
      ...
      mutex_unlock(&job->lock);
      
      And thread B:
      mutex_lock(&job->lock);
      ....
      mutex_unlock(&job->lock);
      kfree(job);
      
      I'm actually not sure if I'm still up to date on this, but this usage
      pattern used to be not allowed with mutexes. See here as well
      https://lwn.net/Articles/575460/.
      
      v2: remove unrelated changes, fix missing owner
      v3: rebased, add more commit message
      Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      e2840221
    • C
      drm/amdgpu: cleanup scheduler fence get/put dance · 4a562283
      Christian König 提交于
      The code was correct, but getting two references when the ownership
      is linearly moved on is a bit awkward and just overhead.
      
      Signed: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      4a562283