Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 15 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • A
      Allow passing O_PATH descriptors via SCM_RIGHTS datagrams · 326be7b4
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Just need to make sure that AF_UNIX garbage collector won't
confuse O_PATHed socket on filesystem for real AF_UNIX opened
socket.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      326be7b4
    • A
      New kind of open files - "location only". · 1abf0c71
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      New flag for open(2) - O_PATH.  Semantics:
	* pathname is resolved, but the file itself is _NOT_ opened
as far as filesystem is concerned.
	* almost all operations on the resulting descriptors shall
fail with -EBADF.  Exceptions are:
	1) operations on descriptors themselves (i.e.
		close(), dup(), dup2(), dup3(), fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD),
		fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, ...), fcntl(fd, F_GETFD),
		fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, ...))
	2) fcntl(fd, F_GETFL), for a common non-destructive way to
		check if descriptor is open
	3) "dfd" arguments of ...at(2) syscalls, i.e. the starting
		points of pathname resolution
	* closing such descriptor does *NOT* affect dnotify or
posix locks.
	* permissions are checked as usual along the way to file;
no permission checks are applied to the file itself.  Of course,
giving such thing to syscall will result in permission checks (at
the moment it means checking that starting point of ....at() is
a directory and caller has exec permissions on it).

fget() and fget_light() return NULL on such descriptors; use of
fget_raw() and fget_raw_light() is needed to get them.  That protects
existing code from dealing with those things.

There are two things still missing (they come in the next commits):
one is handling of symlinks (right now we refuse to open them that
way; see the next commit for semantics related to those) and another
is descriptor passing via SCM_RIGHTS datagrams.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      1abf0c71
  5. 10 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 05 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 17 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      fs: Remove unlikely() from fget_light() · 3bc0ba43
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      There's an unlikely() in fget_light() that assumes the file ref count
will be 1. Running the annotate branch profiler on a desktop that is
performing daily tasks (running firefox, evolution, xchat and is also part
of a distcc farm), it shows that the ref count is not 1 that often.

 correct incorrect      %    Function                  File              Line
 ------- ---------      -    --------                  ----              ----
1035099358 6209599193  85    fget_light              file_table.c         315

Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      3bc0ba43
  11. 27 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • E
      fs: allow for more than 2^31 files · 518de9b3
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Robin Holt tried to boot a 16TB system and found af_unix was overflowing
a 32bit value :

<quote>

We were seeing a failure which prevented boot.  The kernel was incapable
of creating either a named pipe or unix domain socket.  This comes down
to a common kernel function called unix_create1() which does:

        atomic_inc(&unix_nr_socks);
        if (atomic_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
                goto out;

The function get_max_files() is a simple return of files_stat.max_files.
files_stat.max_files is a signed integer and is computed in
fs/file_table.c's files_init().

        n = (mempages * (PAGE_SIZE / 1024)) / 10;
        files_stat.max_files = n;

In our case, mempages (total_ram_pages) is approx 3,758,096,384
(0xe0000000).  That leaves max_files at approximately 1,503,238,553.
This causes 2 * get_max_files() to integer overflow.

</quote>

Fix is to let /proc/sys/fs/file-nr & /proc/sys/fs/file-max use long
integers, and change af_unix to use an atomic_long_t instead of atomic_t.

get_max_files() is changed to return an unsigned long.  get_nr_files() is
changed to return a long.

unix_nr_socks is changed from atomic_t to atomic_long_t, while not
strictly needed to address Robin problem.

Before patch (on a 64bit kernel) :
# echo 2147483648 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
-18446744071562067968

After patch:
# echo 2147483648 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
2147483648
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
704     0       2147483648
Reported-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reviewed-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Tested-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      518de9b3
  13. 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • E
      fs: allow for more than 2^31 files · 7e360c38
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Andrew,

Could you please review this patch, you probably are the right guy to
take it, because it crosses fs and net trees.

Note : /proc/sys/fs/file-nr is a read-only file, so this patch doesnt
depend on previous patch (sysctl: fix min/max handling in
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax())

Thanks !

[PATCH V4] fs: allow for more than 2^31 files

Robin Holt tried to boot a 16TB system and found af_unix was overflowing
a 32bit value :

<quote>

We were seeing a failure which prevented boot.  The kernel was incapable
of creating either a named pipe or unix domain socket.  This comes down
to a common kernel function called unix_create1() which does:

        atomic_inc(&unix_nr_socks);
        if (atomic_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
                goto out;

The function get_max_files() is a simple return of files_stat.max_files.
files_stat.max_files is a signed integer and is computed in
fs/file_table.c's files_init().

        n = (mempages * (PAGE_SIZE / 1024)) / 10;
        files_stat.max_files = n;

In our case, mempages (total_ram_pages) is approx 3,758,096,384
(0xe0000000).  That leaves max_files at approximately 1,503,238,553.
This causes 2 * get_max_files() to integer overflow.

</quote>

Fix is to let /proc/sys/fs/file-nr & /proc/sys/fs/file-max use long
integers, and change af_unix to use an atomic_long_t instead of
atomic_t.

get_max_files() is changed to return an unsigned long.
get_nr_files() is changed to return a long.

unix_nr_socks is changed from atomic_t to atomic_long_t, while not
strictly needed to address Robin problem.

Before patch (on a 64bit kernel) :
# echo 2147483648 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
-18446744071562067968

After patch:
# echo 2147483648 >/proc/sys/fs/file-max
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
2147483648
# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
704     0       2147483648
Reported-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reviewed-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Tested-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      7e360c38
  15. 18 8月, 2010 2 次提交
    • N
      fs: scale files_lock · 6416ccb7
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      fs: scale files_lock

Improve scalability of files_lock by adding per-cpu, per-sb files lists,
protected with an lglock. The lglock provides fast access to the per-cpu lists
to add and remove files. It also provides a snapshot of all the per-cpu lists
(although this is very slow).

One difficulty with this approach is that a file can be removed from the list
by another CPU. We must track which per-cpu list the file is on with a new
variale in the file struct (packed into a hole on 64-bit archs). Scalability
could suffer if files are frequently removed from different cpu's list.

However loads with frequent removal of files imply short interval between
adding and removing the files, and the scheduler attempts to avoid moving
processes too far away. Also, even in the case of cross-CPU removal, the
hardware has much more opportunity to parallelise cacheline transfers with N
cachelines than with 1.

A worst-case test of 1 CPU allocating files subsequently being freed by N CPUs
degenerates to contending on a single lock, which is no worse than before. When
more than one CPU are allocating files, even if they are always freed by
different CPUs, there will be more parallelism than the single-lock case.

Testing results:

On a 2 socket, 8 core opteron, I measure the number of times the lock is taken
to remove the file, the number of times it is removed by the same CPU that
added it, and the number of times it is removed by the same node that added it.

Booting:    locks=  25049 cpu-hits=  23174 (92.5%) node-hits=  23945 (95.6%)
kbuild -j16 locks=2281913 cpu-hits=2208126 (96.8%) node-hits=2252674 (98.7%)
dbench 64   locks=4306582 cpu-hits=4287247 (99.6%) node-hits=4299527 (99.8%)

So a file is removed from the same CPU it was added by over 90% of the time.
It remains within the same node 95% of the time.

Tim Chen ran some numbers for a 64 thread Nehalem system performing a compile.

                throughput
2.6.34-rc2      24.5
+patch          24.9

                us      sys     idle    IO wait (in %)
2.6.34-rc2      51.25   28.25   17.25   3.25
+patch          53.75   18.5    19      8.75

So significantly less CPU time spent in kernel code, higher idle time and
slightly higher throughput.

Single threaded performance difference was within the noise of microbenchmarks.
That is not to say penalty does not exist, the code is larger and more memory
accesses required so it will be slightly slower.

Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6416ccb7
    • N
      fs: cleanup files_lock locking · ee2ffa0d
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      fs: cleanup files_lock locking

Lock tty_files with a new spinlock, tty_files_lock; provide helpers to
manipulate the per-sb files list; unexport the files_lock spinlock.

Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Acked-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ee2ffa0d
  17. 13 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 11 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 28 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • E
      vfs/fsnotify: fsnotify_close can delay the final work in fput · c1e5c954
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      fanotify almost works like so:

user context calls fsnotify_* function with a struct file.
   fsnotify takes a reference on the struct path
user context goes about it's buissiness

at some later point in time the fsnotify listener gets the struct path
   fanotify listener calls dentry_open() to create a file which userspace can deal with
      listener drops the reference on the struct path
at some later point the listener calls close() on it's new file

With the switch from struct path to struct file this presents a problem for
fput() and fsnotify_close().  fsnotify_close() is called when the filp has
already reached 0 and __fput() wants to do it's cleanup.

The solution presented here is a bit odd.  If an event is created from a
struct file we take a reference on the file.  We check however if the f_count
was already 0 and if so we take an EXTRA reference EVEN THOUGH IT WAS ZERO.
In __fput() (where we know the f_count hit 0 once) we check if the f_count is
non-zero and if so we drop that 'extra' ref and return without destroying the
file.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      c1e5c954
  23. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • A
      get rid of the magic around f_count in aio · d7065da0
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      __aio_put_req() plays sick games with file refcount.  What
it wants is fput() from atomic context; it's almost always
done with f_count > 1, so they only have to deal with delayed
work in rare cases when their reference happens to be the
last one.  Current code decrements f_count and if it hasn't
hit 0, everything is fine.  Otherwise it keeps a pointer
to struct file (with zero f_count!) around and has delayed
work do __fput() on it.

Better way to do it: use atomic_long_add_unless( , -1, 1)
instead of !atomic_long_dec_and_test().  IOW, decrement it
only if it's not the last reference, leave refcount alone
if it was.  And use normal fput() in delayed work.

I've made that atomic_long_add_unless call a new helper -
fput_atomic().  Drops a reference to file if it's safe to
do in atomic (i.e. if that's not the last one), tells if
it had been able to do that.  aio.c converted to it, __fput()
use is gone.  req->ki_file *always* contributes to refcount
now.  And __fput() became static.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d7065da0
  25. 07 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  27. 07 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  29. 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 17 12月, 2009 6 次提交
  33. 25 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  35. 24 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  37. 12 6月, 2009 2 次提交
    • N
      fs: move mark_files_ro into file_table.c · 864d7c4c
      由 npiggin@suse.de 提交于 
      This function walks the s_files lock, and operates primarily on the
files in a superblock, so it better belongs here (eg. see also
fs_may_remount_ro).

[AV: ... and it shouldn't be static after that move]
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      864d7c4c
    • N
      fs: introduce mnt_clone_write · 96029c4e
      由 npiggin@suse.de 提交于 
      This patch speeds up lmbench lat_mmap test by about another 2% after the
first patch.

Before:
 avg = 462.286
 std = 5.46106

After:
 avg = 453.12
 std = 9.58257

(50 runs of each, stddev gives a reasonable confidence)

It does this by introducing mnt_clone_write, which avoids some heavyweight
operations of mnt_want_write if called on a vfsmount which we know already
has a write count; and mnt_want_write_file, which can call mnt_clone_write
if the file is open for write.

After these two patches, mnt_want_write and mnt_drop_write go from 7% on
the profile down to 1.3% (including mnt_clone_write).

[AV: mnt_want_write_file() should take file alone and derive mnt from it;
not only all callers have that form, but that's the only mnt about which
we know that it's already held for write if file is opened for write]

Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      96029c4e
  39. 30 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  41. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  43. 06 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  45. 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  47. 14 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  49. 02 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      saner FASYNC handling on file close · 233e70f4
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      As it is, all instances of ->release() for files that have ->fasync()
need to remember to evict file from fasync lists; forgetting that
creates a hole and we actually have a bunch that *does* forget.

So let's keep our lives simple - let __fput() check FASYNC in
file->f_flags and call ->fasync() there if it's been set.  And lose that
crap in ->release() instances - leaving it there is still valid, but we
don't have to bother anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      233e70f4
  51. 21 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  53. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  55. 02 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  57. 19 4月, 2008 2 次提交