Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Do the initialization in the caller, and clarify that the only failure
ever possible here was due to allocation.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

It'll be useful to have connection allocation and initialization as
separate functions.

Also, note we'd been ignoring the alloc_conn error return in
bind_conn_to_session.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This could simplify the logic a little later.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Something like creating a client with setclientid and then trying to
confirm it with create_session may not crash the server, but I'm not
completely positive of that, and in any case it's obviously bad client
behavior.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

And remove some mostly obsolete comments.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

I added cr_flavor to the data compared in same_creds without any
justification, in d5497fc6 "nfsd4: move
rq_flavor into svc_cred".

Recent client changes then started making

	mount -osec=krb5 server:/export /mnt/
	echo "hello" >/mnt/TMP
	umount /mnt/
	mount -osec=krb5i server:/export /mnt/
	echo "hello" >/mnt/TMP

to fail due to a clid_inuse on the second open.

Mounting sequentially like this with different flavors probably isn't
that common outside artificial tests.  Also, the real bug here may be
that the server isn't just destroying the former clientid in this case
(because it isn't good enough at recognizing when the old state is
gone).  But it prompted some discussion and a look back at the spec, and
I think the check was probably wrong.  Fix and document.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Somehow we ended up with identical functions "nfs4_free_stateid" and
"free_generic_stateid".
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Processes that open and close multiple files may end up setting this
oo_last_closed_stid without freeing what was previously pointed to.
This can result in a major leak, visible for example by watching the
nfsd4_stateids line of /proc/slabinfo.
Reported-by: NCyril B. <cbay@excellency.fr>
Tested-by: NCyril B. <cbay@excellency.fr>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

struct file_lock is pretty large and really ought not live on the stack.
On my x86_64 machine, they're almost 200 bytes each.

    (gdb) p sizeof(struct file_lock)
    $1 = 192

...allocate them dynamically instead.
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The code checks for a NULL filp and handles it gracefully just before
this BUG_ON.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

locks.c doesn't use the BKL anymore and there is no fi_perfile field.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

NFSd's boot_time represents grace period start point in time.
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Passed network namespace replaced hard-coded init_net
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This patch adds recall_lock hold to nfsd_forget_delegations() to protect
nfsd_process_n_delegations() call.
Also, looks like it would be better to collect delegations to some local
on-stack list, and then unhash collected list. This split allows to
simplify locking, because delegation traversing is protected by recall_lock,
when delegation unhash is protected by client_mutex.
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This fixes a wrong check for same cr_principal in same_creds

Introduced by 8fbba96e "nfsd4: stricter
cred comparison for setclientid/exchange_id".

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NVivek Trivedi <vtrivedi018@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We don't need to keep openowners around in the >=4.1 case, because they
aren't needed to handle CLOSE replays any more (that's a problem for
sessions).  And doing so causes unexpected failures on a subsequent
destroy_clientid to fail.

We probably also need something comparable for lock owners on last
unlock.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Note we can simplify the error handling a little by doing the truncate
earlier.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Share a little common logic.  And note the comments here are a little
out of date (e.g. we don't always create new state in the "new" case any
more.)
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

According to RFC 5661, the TEST_STATEID operation is not allowed to
return NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID.  In addition, RFC 5661 says:

15.1.16.5.  NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID (Error Code 10023)

   A stateid generated by an earlier server instance was used.  This
   error is moot in NFSv4.1 because all operations that take a stateid
   MUST be preceded by the SEQUENCE operation, and the earlier server
   instance is detected by the session infrastructure that supports
   SEQUENCE.

I triggered NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID while testing the Linux client's
NOGRACE recovery.  Bruce suggested an additional test that could be
useful to client developers.

Lastly, RFC 5661, section 18.48.3 has this:

 o  Special stateids are always considered invalid (they result in the
    error code NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID).

An explicit check is made for those state IDs to avoid printk noise.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Initiate a CB probe when a new connection with the correct direction is added
to a session (IFF backchannel is marked as down).  Without this a
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION has no effect on the internal backchannel state, which
causes the server to reply to every SEQUENCE op with the
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN flag set until DESTROY_SESSION.
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Most frequent symptom was a BUG triggering in expire_client, with the
server locking up shortly thereafter.

Introduced by 508dc6e1 "nfsd41:
free_session/free_client must be called under the client_lock".

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Whoops: first, I reimplemented the already-existing has_resources
without noticing; second, I got the test backwards.  I did pick a better
name, though.  Combine the two....
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

In the NFSv4.1 client-reboot case we're currently removing the client's
previous state in exchange_id.  That's wrong--we should be waiting till
the confirming create_session.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The comment is redundant, and if we really want dprintk's here they'd
probably be better in the common (check-slot_seqid) code.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The client should ignore the returned sequence_id in the case where the
CONFIRMED flag is set on an exchange_id reply--and in the unconfirmed
case "1" is always the right response.  So it shouldn't actually matter
what we return here.

We could continue returning 1 just to catch clients ignoring the spec
here, but I'd rather be generous.  Other things equal, returning the
existing sequence_id seems more informative.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Otherwise nfsd4_set_ex_flags writes over the return flags.
Reported-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This can't happen:
	- cl_time is zeroed only by unhash_client_locked, which is only
	  ever called under both the state lock and the client lock.
	- every caller of renew_client() should have looked up a
	  (non-expired) client and then called renew_client() all
	  without dropping the state lock.
	- the only other caller of renew_client_locked() is
	  release_session_client(), which first checks under the
	  client_lock that the cl_time is nonzero.

So make it clear that this is a bug, not something we handle.  I can't
quite bring myself to make this a BUG(), though, as there are a lot of
renew_client() callers, and returning here is probably safer than a
BUG().

We'll consider making it a BUG() after some more cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The cases here divide into two main categories:

	- if there's an uncomfirmed record with a matching verifier,
	  then this is a "normal", succesful case: we're either creating
	  a new client, or updating an existing one.
	- otherwise, this is a weird case: a replay, or a server reboot.

Reordering to reflect that makes the code a bit more concise and the
logic a lot easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Note CLID_INUSE is for the case where two clients are trying to use the
same client-provided long-form client identifiers.  But what we're
looking at here is the server-returned shorthand client id--if those
clash there's a bug somewhere.

Fix the error return, pull the check out into common code, and do the
check unconditionally in all cases.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

New clients are created only by nfsd4_setclientid(), which always gives
any new client a unique clientid.  The only exception is in the
"callback update" case, in which case it may create an unconfirmed
client with the same clientid as a confirmed client.  In that case it
also checks that the confirmed client has the same credential.

Therefore, it is pointless for setclientid_confirm to check whether a
confirmed and unconfirmed client with the same clientid have matching
credentials--they're guaranteed to.

Instead, it should be checking whether the credential on the
setclientid_confirm matches either of those.  Otherwise, it could be
anyone sending the setclientid_confirm.  Granted, I can't see why anyone
would, but still it's probalby safer to check.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Boy, is this simpler.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The code here is mostly the same.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Be a little more concise.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>