1. 02 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  2. 01 5月, 2012 17 次提交
  3. 30 4月, 2012 4 次提交
  4. 28 4月, 2012 3 次提交
    • N
      drop_monitor: Make updating data->skb smp safe · 3885ca78
      Neil Horman 提交于
      Eric Dumazet pointed out to me that the drop_monitor protocol has some holes in
      its smp protections.  Specifically, its possible to replace data->skb while its
      being written.  This patch corrects that by making data->skb an rcu protected
      variable.  That will prevent it from being overwritten while a tracepoint is
      modifying it.
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      CC: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3885ca78
    • N
      drop_monitor: fix sleeping in invalid context warning · cde2e9a6
      Neil Horman 提交于
      Eric Dumazet pointed out this warning in the drop_monitor protocol to me:
      
      [   38.352571] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:85
      [   38.352576] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 4415, name: dropwatch
      [   38.352580] Pid: 4415, comm: dropwatch Not tainted 3.4.0-rc2+ #71
      [   38.352582] Call Trace:
      [   38.352592]  [<ffffffff8153aaf0>] ? trace_napi_poll_hit+0xd0/0xd0
      [   38.352599]  [<ffffffff81063f2a>] __might_sleep+0xca/0xf0
      [   38.352606]  [<ffffffff81655b16>] mutex_lock+0x26/0x50
      [   38.352610]  [<ffffffff8153aaf0>] ? trace_napi_poll_hit+0xd0/0xd0
      [   38.352616]  [<ffffffff810b72d9>] tracepoint_probe_register+0x29/0x90
      [   38.352621]  [<ffffffff8153a585>] set_all_monitor_traces+0x105/0x170
      [   38.352625]  [<ffffffff8153a8ca>] net_dm_cmd_trace+0x2a/0x40
      [   38.352630]  [<ffffffff8154a81a>] genl_rcv_msg+0x21a/0x2b0
      [   38.352636]  [<ffffffff810f8029>] ? zone_statistics+0x99/0xc0
      [   38.352640]  [<ffffffff8154a600>] ? genl_rcv+0x30/0x30
      [   38.352645]  [<ffffffff8154a059>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0
      [   38.352649]  [<ffffffff8154a5f0>] genl_rcv+0x20/0x30
      [   38.352653]  [<ffffffff81549a7e>] netlink_unicast+0x1ae/0x1f0
      [   38.352658]  [<ffffffff81549d76>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2b6/0x310
      [   38.352663]  [<ffffffff8150824f>] sock_sendmsg+0x10f/0x130
      [   38.352668]  [<ffffffff8150abe0>] ? move_addr_to_kernel+0x60/0xb0
      [   38.352673]  [<ffffffff81515f04>] ? verify_iovec+0x64/0xe0
      [   38.352677]  [<ffffffff81509c46>] __sys_sendmsg+0x386/0x390
      [   38.352682]  [<ffffffff810ffaf9>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x139/0x210
      [   38.352687]  [<ffffffff8165b5bc>] ? do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x4f0
      [   38.352693]  [<ffffffff8106ba4d>] ? set_next_entity+0x9d/0xb0
      [   38.352699]  [<ffffffff81310b49>] ? tty_ldisc_deref+0x9/0x10
      [   38.352703]  [<ffffffff8106d363>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0x63/0x140
      [   38.352708]  [<ffffffff8150b8d4>] sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x80
      [   38.352713]  [<ffffffff8165f8e2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      It stems from holding a spinlock (trace_state_lock) while attempting to register
      or unregister tracepoint hooks, making in_atomic() true in this context, leading
      to the warning when the tracepoint calls might_sleep() while its taking a mutex.
      Since we only use the trace_state_lock to prevent trace protocol state races, as
      well as hardware stat list updates on an rcu write side, we can just convert the
      spinlock to a mutex to avoid this problem.
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      CC: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cde2e9a6
    • N
      tcp: clean up use of jiffies in tcp_rcv_rtt_measure() · 651913ce
      Neal Cardwell 提交于
      Clean up a reference to jiffies in tcp_rcv_rtt_measure() that should
      instead reference tcp_time_stamp. Since the result of the subtraction
      is passed into a function taking u32, this should not change any
      behavior (and indeed the generated assembly does not change on
      x86_64). However, it seems worth cleaning this up for consistency and
      clarity (and perhaps to avoid bugs if this is copied and pasted
      somewhere else).
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      651913ce
  5. 27 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 26 4月, 2012 12 次提交