- 27 2月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The ocfs2 extended attribute (xattr) code is very flexible. It can store xattrs in the inode itself, in an external block, or in a tree of data structures. This allows the number of xattrs to be bounded by the filesystem size. However, the code that manages each possible storage location is different. Maintaining the ocfs2 xattr code requires changing each hunk separately. This patch is the start of a series introducing the ocfs2_xa_loc structure. This structure wraps the on-disk details of an xattr entry. The goal is that the generic xattr routines can use ocfs2_xa_loc without knowing the underlying storage location. This first pass merely implements the basic structure, initializing it, and wiping the name+value pair of the entry. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
This patch add extent block (metadata) stealing mechanism for extent allocation. This mechanism is same as the inode stealing. if no room in slot specific extent_alloc, we will try to allocate extent block from the next slot. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Acked-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 24 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ocfs2_value_metas_in_xattr_header, we should Use le16_to_cpu for ocfs2_extent_list.l_next_free_rec. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add a flags argument to struct xattr_handler and pass it to all xattr handler methods. This allows using the same methods for multiple handlers, e.g. for the ACL methods which perform exactly the same action for the access and default ACLs, just using a different underlying attribute. With a little more groundwork it'll also allow sharing the methods for the regular user/trusted/secure handlers in extN, ocfs2 and jffs2 like it's already done for xfs in this patch. Also change the inode argument to the handlers to a dentry to allow using the handlers mechnism for filesystems that require it later, e.g. cifs. [with GFS2 bits updated by Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>] Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 29 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
To become consistent with filesystems such as XFS or BTRFS, make posix ACLs always available. This also reduces possibility of misconfiguration on admin's side. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2009 11 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
reflink has 2 options for the destination file: 1. snapshot: reflink will attempt to preserve ownership, permissions, and all other security state in order to create a full snapshot. 2. new file: it will acquire the data extent sharing but will see the file's security state and attributes initialized as a new file. So add the option to ocfs2. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
The old xattr value remove is quite simple, it just erase the tree and free the clusters. But as we have added refcount support, The process is a little complicated. We have to lock the refcount tree at the beginning, what's more, we may split the refcount tree in some cases, so meta/credits are needed. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
With reflink, there is a need that we create a new xattr indexed block from the very beginning. So add a new parameter for ocfs2_create_xattr_block. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Now with xattr refcount support, we need to check whether we have xattr refcounted before we remove the refcount tree. Now the mechanism is: 1) Check whether i_clusters == 0, if no, exit. 2) check whether we have i_xattr_loc in dinode. if yes, exit. 2) Check whether we have inline xattr stored outside, if yes, exit. 4) Remove the tree. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ocfs2, when xattr's value is larger than OCFS2_XATTR_INLINE_SIZE, it will be kept outside of the blocks we store xattr entry. And they are stored in a b-tree also. So this patch try to attach all these clusters to refcount tree also. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Currently we have ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets which can receive a para and a callback to iterate a series of bucket. It is good. But actually the 2 callers ocfs2_xattr_tree_list_index_block and ocfs2_delete_xattr_index_block are almost the same. The only difference is that the latter need to handle the extent record also. So add a new function named ocfs2_iterate_xattr_index_block. It can be given func callback which are used for exten record. So now we only have one iteration function for the xattr index block. Ane what's more, it is useful for our future reflink operations. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In xattr reflink, we also need to create xattr block, so abstract the process out. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ocfs2_xattr_bucket_get_name_value, actually we only use super_block. So use it. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In order to make 2 transcation(xattr and cow) independent with each other, we CoW the whole xattr out in case we are setting them. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
With the new refcount tree, xattr value can also be refcounted among multiple files. So return the appropriate extent flags so that CoW can used it later. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2009 7 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
With this commit, extent tree operations are divorced from inodes and rely on ocfs2_caching_info. Phew! Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more generic btree function that is isolated from struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function that doesn't need a struct inode to pass to its children. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function down, no inode in the entire insert-extent chain. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_find_path and ocfs2_find_leaf() walk our btrees, reading extent blocks. They need struct ocfs2_caching_info for that, but not struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The next step in divorcing metadata I/O management from struct inode is to pass struct ocfs2_caching_info to the journal functions. Thus the journal locks a metadata cache with the cache io_lock function. It also can compare ci_last_trans and ci_created_trans directly. This is a large patch because of all the places we change ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, inode, ...) to ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), ...). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We are really passing the inode into the ocfs2_read/write_blocks() functions to get at the metadata cache. This commit passes the cache directly into the metadata block functions, divorcing them from the inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Subrata Modak 提交于
gcc 4.4.1 generates the following build warning on i386: CC [M] fs/ocfs2/xattr.o fs/ocfs2/xattr.c: In function ‘ocfs2_xattr_block_get’: fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:1055: warning: ‘block_off’ may be used uninitialized in this function The following fix is based on a similar approach by David Howells few days back: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/109, Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Currently the kernel defines XATTR_LIST_MAX as 65536 in include/linux/limits.h. This is the largest buffer that is used for listing xattrs. But with ocfs2 xattr tree, we actually have no limit for the number. If filesystem has more names than can fit in the buffer, the kernel logs will be pollluted with something like this when listing: (27738,0):ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets:3158 ERROR: status = -34 (27738,0):ocfs2_xattr_tree_list_index_block:3264 ERROR: status = -34 So don't print "ERROR" message as this is not an ocfs2 error. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
This patch makes use of Ocfs2's flexible btree code to add an additional tree to directory inodes. The new tree stores an array of small, fixed-length records in each leaf block. Each record stores a hash value, and pointer to a block in the traditional (unindexed) directory tree where a dirent with the given name hash resides. Lookup exclusively uses this tree to find dirents, thus providing us with constant time name lookups. Some of the hashing code was copied from ext3. Unfortunately, it has lots of unfixed checkpatch errors. I left that as-is so that tracking changes would be easier. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
A long time ago, xs->base is allocated a 4K size and all the contents in the bucket are copied to the it. Now we use ocfs2_xattr_bucket to abstract xattr bucket and xs->base is initialized to the start of the bu_bhs[0]. So xs->base + offset will overflow when the value root is stored outside the first block. Then why we can survive the xattr test by now? It is because we always read the bucket contiguously now and kernel mm allocate continguous memory for us. We are lucky, but we should fix it. So just get the right value root as other callers do. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
If this is a new directory with inline data, we choose to reserve the entire inline area for directory contents and force an external xattr block. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
This patch set a gap (4 bytes) between xattr entry and name/value when xattr in bucket. This gap use to seperate entry and name/value when a bucket is full. It had already been set when xattr in inode/block. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
For other metadata in ocfs2, metaecc is checked in ocfs2_read_blocks with io_mutex held. While for xattr bucket, it is calculated by the whole buckets. So we have to add a spin_lock to prevent multiple processes calculating metaecc. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Tested-by: NTristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ctime updating of xattr, it use the wrong type of access for inode, so use ocfs2_journal_access_di instead. Reported-and-Tested-by: NTristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate, we may call b-tree codes which will extend the journal transaction. It has a potential problem that it may let the already-accessed-but-not-dirtied buffers gone. So we'd better access the bucket after we call ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate. And as for the root buffer for the xattr value, b-tree code will acess and dirty it, so we don't need to worry about it. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 8 次提交
-
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
We must check whether ocfs2 volume support xattr in init_security, if not support xattr and security is enable, would cause failure of mknod. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
In extreme situation, may need xattr bucket for setting security entry and acl entries during mknod. This only happens when block size is too small. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
We extend the credits for xattr's large value in set_value_outside before, this can give rise to a credits issue when we set one security entry and two acl entries duing mknod. As we remove extend_trans form set_value_outside, we must calculate and reserve the credits for xattr's large value in mknod. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
When creating a xattr index block, the old calculation forget to add credits for the meta change of the alloc file. So add more credits and more comments to explain it. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In xattr set, we should always update ctime if the operation goes sucessfully. The old one mistakenly put it in ocfs2_xattr_set_entry which is only called when we set xattr in inode or xattr block. The side benefit is that it resolve the bug 1052 since in that scenario, ocfs2_calc_xattr_set_need only calc out the xattr set credits while ocfs2_xattr_set_entry update the inode also which isn't concerned with the process of xattr set. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Actually, when setting a new xattr value, we know it from the very beginning, and it isn't like the extension of bucket in which case we can't figure it out. So remove ocfs2_extend_trans in that function and calculate it before the transaction. It also relieve acl operation from the worry about the side effect of ocfs2_extend_trans. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Change the rest of the naked ocfs2_journal_access() calls in fs/ocfs2/xattr.c to use the appropriate ocfs2_journal_access_*() call for their metadata type. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_remove_value_outside() needs to know the type of buffer it is looking at. Pass in an ocfs2_xattr_value_buf. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-