Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 6月, 2017 4 次提交
  3. 27 5月, 2017 3 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Implement common FID core · a1107487
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The device supports three types of FIDs. 802.1Q and 802.1D FIDs for
VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware bridges (respectively) and rFIDs to
transport packets to the router block.

The different users (e.g., bridge, router, ACLs) of the FIDs
infrastructure need not know about the internal FIDs implementation and
can therefore interact with it using a restricted set of exported
functions.

By encapsulating the entire FID logic and hiding it from the rest of the
driver we get a code base that it much simpler and easier to work with
and extend.

For example, in the current Spectrum ASIC only 802.1D FIDs can be
assigned a VNI, but future ASICs will also support 802.1Q FIDs. With
this patch in place, support for future ASICs can be easily added by
implementing a new FID operations according to their capabilities.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a1107487
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Replace vPorts with Port-VLAN · c57529e1
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      As explained in the cover letter, since the introduction of the bridge
offload in the mlxsw driver, information related to the offloaded bridge
and bridge ports was stored in the individual port struct,
mlxsw_sp_port.

This lead to a bloated struct storing both physical properties of the
port (e.g., autoneg status) as well as logical properties of an upper
bridge port (e.g., learning, mrouter indication). While this might work
well for simple devices, it proved to be hard to extend when stacked
devices were taken into account and more advanced use-cases (e.g., IGMP
snooping) considered.

This patch removes the excess information from the above struct and
instead stores it in more appropriate structs that represent the bridge
port, the bridge itself and a VLAN configured on the bridge port.

The membership of a port in a bridge is denoted using the Port-VLAN
struct, which points to the bridge port and also member in the bridge
VLAN group of the VLAN it represents. This allows us to completely
remove the vPort abstraction and consolidate many of the code paths
relating to VLAN-aware and unaware bridges.

Note that the FID / vFID code is currently duplicated, but this will
soon go away when the common FID core will be introduced.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c57529e1
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Set port's mode according to FID mappings · 4aafc368
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We currently transition the port to "Virtual mode" upon the creation of
its first VLAN upper, as we need to classify incoming packets to a FID
using {Port, VID} and not only the VID.

However, it's more appropriate to transition the port to this mode when
the {Port, VID} are actually mapped to a FID. Either during the
enslavement of the VLAN upper to a VLAN-unaware bridge or the
configuration of a router port.

Do this change now in preparation for the introduction of the FID core,
where this operation will be encapsulated.

To prevent regressions, this patch also explicitly configures an OVS
slave to "Virtual mode". Otherwise, a packet that didn't hit an ACL rule
could be classified to an existing FID based on a global VID-to-FID
mapping, thus not incurring a FID mis-classification, which would
otherwise trap the packet to the CPU to be processed by the OVS daemon.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4aafc368
  5. 18 5月, 2017 7 次提交
  7. 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 25 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 11 2月, 2017 6 次提交
  15. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 24 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 21 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 02 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  25. 25 8月, 2016 6 次提交
  27. 18 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  29. 05 7月, 2016 3 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Enable L3 interfaces on top of bridge devices · 99f44bb3
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      As with the previously introduced L3 interfaces, listen to 'inetaddr'
notifications sent for bridges devices configured on top of the port
netdevs and create / destroy router interfaces (RIFs) accordingly.
This also includes VLAN devices configured on top of the VLAN-aware
bridge.

The RIFs will be destroyed either when the last IP address is removed or
when the underlying FID is is destroyed.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      99f44bb3
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Configure FIDs based on bridge events · 701b186e
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      Before introducing support for L3 interfaces on top of the VLAN-aware
bridge we need to add some missing infrastructure.

Such an interface can either be the bridge device itself or a VLAN
device on top of it. In the first case the router interface (RIF) is
associated with FID 1, which is created whenever the first port netdev
joins the bridge. We currently assume the default PVID is 1 and that
it's already created, as it seems reasonable. This can be extended in
the future.

However, in the second case it's entirely possible we've yet to create a
matching FID. This can happen if the VLAN device was configured before
making any bridge port member in the VLAN.

Prevent such ordering problems by using the VLAN device's CHANGEUPPER
event to configure the FID. Make the VLAN device hold a reference to the
FID and prevent it from being destroyed even if none of the port netdevs
is using it.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      701b186e
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce support for router interfaces · 99724c18
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      Up until now we only supported bridged interfaces. Packets ingressing
through the switch ports were either classified to FIDs (in the case of
the VLAN-aware bridge) or vFIDs (in the case of VLAN-unaware bridges).
The packets were then forwarded according to the FDB. Routing was done
entirely in slowpath, by splitting the vFID range in two and using the
lower 0.5K vFIDs as dummy bridges that simply flooded all incoming
traffic to the CPU.

Instead, allow packets to be routed in the device by creating router
interfaces (RIFs) that will direct them to the router block.
Specifically, the RIFs introduced here are Sub-port RIFs used for VLAN
devices and port netdevs. Packets ingressing from the {Port / LAG ID, VID}
with which the RIF was programmed with will be assigned to a special
kind of FIDs called rFIDs and from there directed to the router.

Create a RIF whenever the first IPv4 address was programmed on a VLAN /
LAG / port netdev. Destroy it upon removal of the last IPv4 address.
Receive these notifications by registering for the 'inetaddr'
notification chain. A non-zero (10) priority is used for the
notification block, so that RIFs will be created before routes are
offloaded via FIB code.

Note that another trigger for RIF destruction are CHANGEUPPER
notifications causing the underlying FID's reference count to go down to
zero. This can happen, for example, when a VLAN netdev with an IP address
is put under bridge. While this configuration doesn't make sense it does
cause the device and the kernel to get out of sync when the netdev is
unbridged. We intend to address this in the future, hopefully in current
cycle.

Finally, Remove the lower 0.5K vFIDs, as they are deprecated by the RIFs,
which will trap packets according to their DIP.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      99724c18