Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 1月, 2010 7 次提交
  3. 30 12月, 2009 6 次提交
  5. 28 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 22 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 17 12月, 2009 2 次提交
    • F
      perf events, x86/stacktrace: Make stack walking optional · 61c1917f
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      The current print_context_stack helper that does the stack
walking job is good for usual stacktraces as it walks through
all the stack and reports even addresses that look unreliable,
which is nice when we don't have frame pointers for example.

But we have users like perf that only require reliable
stacktraces, and those may want a more adapted stack walker, so
lets make this function a callback in stacktrace_ops that users
can tune for their needs.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
LKML-Reference: <1261024834-5336-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      61c1917f
    • M
      kprobe-tracer: Check new event/group name · 6f3cf440
      由 Masami Hiramatsu 提交于 
      Check new event/group name is same syntax as a C symbol. In other
words, checking the name is as like as other tracepoint events.

This can prevent user to create an event with useless name (e.g.
foo|bar, foo*bar).
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Cc: DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>
LKML-Reference: <20091216222408.14459.68790.stgit@dhcp-100-2-132.bos.redhat.com>
[ v2: minor cleanups ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      6f3cf440
  11. 16 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 15 12月, 2009 4 次提交
  15. 14 12月, 2009 13 次提交
  17. 12 12月, 2009 2 次提交
    • S
      kbuild: move utsrelease.h to include/generated · 273b281f
      由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于 
      Fix up all users of utsrelease.h
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: NMichal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
      273b281f
    • S
      tracing: Add stack trace to irqsoff tracer · cc51a0fc
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      The irqsoff and friends tracers help in finding causes of latency in the
kernel. The also work with the function tracer to show what was happening
when interrupts or preemption are disabled. But the function tracer has
a bit of an overhead and can cause exagerated readings.

Currently, when tracing with /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled = 0, where the
function tracer is disabled, the information that is provided can end up
being useless. For example, a 2 and a half millisecond latency only showed:

 # tracer: preemptirqsoff
 #
 # preemptirqsoff latency trace v1.1.5 on 2.6.32
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------
 # latency: 2463 us, #4/4, CPU#2 | (M:preempt VP:0, KP:0, SP:0 HP:0 #P:4)
 #    -----------------
 #    | task: -4242 (uid:0 nice:0 policy:0 rt_prio:0)
 #    -----------------
 #  => started at: _spin_lock_irqsave
 #  => ended at:   remove_wait_queue
 #
 #
 #                  _------=> CPU#
 #                 / _-----=> irqs-off
 #                | / _----=> need-resched
 #                || / _---=> hardirq/softirq
 #                ||| / _--=> preempt-depth
 #                |||| /_--=> lock-depth
 #                |||||/     delay
 #  cmd     pid   |||||| time  |   caller
 #     \   /      ||||||   \   |   /
 hackbenc-4242    2d....    0us!: trace_hardirqs_off <-_spin_lock_irqsave
 hackbenc-4242    2...1. 2463us+: _spin_unlock_irqrestore <-remove_wait_queue
 hackbenc-4242    2...1. 2466us : trace_preempt_on <-remove_wait_queue

The above lets us know that hackbench with pid 2463 grabbed a spin lock
somewhere and enabled preemption at remove_wait_queue. This helps a little
but where this actually happened is not informative.

This patch adds the stack dump to the end of the irqsoff tracer. This provides
the following output:

 hackbenc-4242    2d....    0us!: trace_hardirqs_off <-_spin_lock_irqsave
 hackbenc-4242    2...1. 2463us+: _spin_unlock_irqrestore <-remove_wait_queue
 hackbenc-4242    2...1. 2466us : trace_preempt_on <-remove_wait_queue
 hackbenc-4242    2...1. 2467us : <stack trace>
  => sub_preempt_count
  => _spin_unlock_irqrestore
  => remove_wait_queue
  => free_poll_entry
  => poll_freewait
  => do_sys_poll
  => sys_poll
  => system_call_fastpath

Now we see that the culprit of this latency was the free_poll_entry code.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      cc51a0fc
  19. 11 12月, 2009 3 次提交
    • S
      tracing: Add trace_dump_stack() · 03889384
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      I've been asked a few times about how to find out what is calling
some location in the kernel. One way is to use dynamic function tracing
and implement the func_stack_trace. But this only finds out who is
calling a particular function. It does not tell you who is calling
that function and entering a specific if conditional.

I have myself implemented a quick version of trace_dump_stack() for
this purpose a few times, and just needed it now. This is when I realized
that this would be a good tool to have in the kernel like trace_printk().

Using trace_dump_stack() is similar to dump_stack() except that it
writes to the trace buffer instead and can be used in critical locations.

For example:

@@ -5485,8 +5485,12 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 	if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
 		if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
 			prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-		else
+		else {
 			deactivate_task(rq, prev, 1);
+			trace_printk("Deactivating task %s:%d\n",
+				     prev->comm, prev->pid);
+			trace_dump_stack();
+		}
 		switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
 	}

Produces:

           <...>-3249  [001]   296.105269: schedule: Deactivating task ntpd:3249
           <...>-3249  [001]   296.105270: <stack trace>
 => schedule
 => schedule_hrtimeout_range
 => poll_schedule_timeout
 => do_select
 => core_sys_select
 => sys_select
 => system_call_fastpath
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      03889384
    • S
      ring-buffer: Move resize integrity check under reader lock · dd7f5943
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      While using an application that does splice on the ftrace ring
buffer at start up, I triggered an integrity check failure.

Looking into this, I discovered that resizing the buffer performs
an integrity check after the buffer is resized. This check unfortunately
is preformed after it releases the reader lock. If a reader is
reading the buffer it may cause the integrity check to trigger a
false failure.

This patch simply moves the integrity checker under the protection
of the ring buffer reader lock.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      dd7f5943
    • S
      ring-buffer: Use sync sched protection on ring buffer resizing · 18421015
      由 Steven Rostedt 提交于 
      There was a comment in the ring buffer code that says the calling
layers should prevent tracing or reading of the ring buffer while
resizing. I have discovered that the tracers do not honor this
arrangement.

This patch moves the disabling and synchronizing the ring buffer to
a higher layer during resizing. This guarantees that no writes
are occurring while the resize takes place.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      18421015