1. 02 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 28 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 27 9月, 2009 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Kill overly verbose "power state" log messages · 3d5b6fb4
      Roland Dreier 提交于
      I was recently lucky enough to get a 64-CPU system, so my kernel log
      ends up with 64 lines like:
      
          ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C3])
      
      This is pretty useless clutter because this info is already available
      after boot from both /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/state?/ as
      well as /proc/acpi/processor/CPU*/power.
      
      So just delete the code that prints the C-states in processor_idle.c.
      Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      3d5b6fb4
    • J
      ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message · 14f03343
      Jean Delvare 提交于
      The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The
      device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom
      API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If
      not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example
      "thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list).
      
      I propose to reword the message to:
      
      ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
      it instead of the native driver
      
      which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome.
      
      I also added a message warning about possible problems and system
      instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested
      by Len.
      Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
      Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      14f03343
  4. 26 9月, 2009 24 次提交
  5. 24 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  6. 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 21 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • F
      x86: Trivial whitespace cleanups · 878f4f53
      Felipe Contreras 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NFelipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
      Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
      Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
      Cc: "Tan Wei Chong" <wei.chong.tan@intel.com>
      Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <1253137123-18047-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      878f4f53
  8. 19 9月, 2009 6 次提交
  9. 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI / ACPI PM: Propagate wake-up enable for devices w/o ACPI support · 0baed8da
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Some PCI devices (not PCI Express), like PCI add-on cards, can
      generate PME#, but they don't have any special platform wake-up
      support.  For this reason, even if they generate PME# to wake up the
      system from a sleep state, wake-up events are not generated by the
      platform.
      
      It turns out that, at least on some systems, PCI bridges and the PCI
      host bridge have ACPI GPEs associated with them that, if enabled to
      generate wake-up events, allow the system to wake up if one of the
      add-on devices asserts PME# while the system is in a sleep state.
      Following this observation, if a PCI device without direct ACPI
      wake-up support is prepared to wake up the system during a transition
      into a sleep state (eg. suspend to RAM), try to configure the bridges
      on the path from the device to the root bridge to wake-up the system.
      Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      0baed8da