- 15 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
If the underlying block device suddenly stops supporting barriers, we need to handle the -EOPNOTSUPP error in a sane manner rather than shutting down the filesystem. If we get this error, clear the barrier flag, reissue the I/O, and tell the world bad things are occurring. SGI-PV: 964544 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28568a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Sparse now warns about comparing pointers to 0, so change all instance where that happens to NULL instead. SGI-PV: 968555 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:29308a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 14 7月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
When we have a couple of hundred transactions on the fly at once, they all typically modify the on disk superblock in some way. create/unclink/mkdir/rmdir modify inode counts, allocation/freeing modify free block counts. When these counts are modified in a transaction, they must eventually lock the superblock buffer and apply the mods. The buffer then remains locked until the transaction is committed into the incore log buffer. The result of this is that with enough transactions on the fly the incore superblock buffer becomes a bottleneck. The result of contention on the incore superblock buffer is that transaction rates fall - the more pressure that is put on the superblock buffer, the slower things go. The key to removing the contention is to not require the superblock fields in question to be locked. We do that by not marking the superblock dirty in the transaction. IOWs, we modify the incore superblock but do not modify the cached superblock buffer. In short, we do not log superblock modifications to critical fields in the superblock on every transaction. In fact we only do it just before we write the superblock to disk every sync period or just before unmount. This creates an interesting problem - if we don't log or write out the fields in every transaction, then how do the values get recovered after a crash? the answer is simple - we keep enough duplicate, logged information in other structures that we can reconstruct the correct count after log recovery has been performed. It is the AGF and AGI structures that contain the duplicate information; after recovery, we walk every AGI and AGF and sum their individual counters to get the correct value, and we do a transaction into the log to correct them. An optimisation of this is that if we have a clean unmount record, we know the value in the superblock is correct, so we can avoid the summation walk under normal conditions and so mount/recovery times do not change under normal operation. One wrinkle that was discovered during development was that the blocks used in the freespace btrees are never accounted for in the AGF counters. This was once a valid optimisation to make; when the filesystem is full, the free space btrees are empty and consume no space. Hence when it matters, the "accounting" is correct. But that means the when we do the AGF summations, we would not have a correct count and xfs_check would complain. Hence a new counter was added to track the number of blocks used by the free space btrees. This is an *on-disk format change*. As a result of this, lazy superblock counters are a mkfs option and at the moment on linux there is no way to convert an old filesystem. This is possible - xfs_db can be used to twiddle the right bits and then xfs_repair will do the format conversion for you. Similarly, you can convert backwards as well. At some point we'll add functionality to xfs_admin to do the bit twiddling easily.... SGI-PV: 964999 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28652a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
When setting the length of the iclogbuf to write out we should just be changing the desired byte count rather completely reassociating the buffer memory with the buffer. Reassociating the buffer memory changes the apparent length of the buffer and hence when we free the buffer, we don't free all the vmap()d space we originally allocated. SGI-PV: 964983 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28640a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
Don't reference the log buffer after running the callbacks as the callback can trigger the log buffers to be freed during unmount. SGI-PV: 964545 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28567a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Many block drivers (aoe, iscsi) really want refcountable pages in bios, which is what almost everyone send down. XFS unfortunately has a few places where it sends down buffers that may come from kmalloc, which breaks them. Fix the places that use kmalloc()d buffers. SGI-PV: 964546 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28562a Signed-Off-By: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Shimmin 提交于
space for the unmount record - which becomes a problem in the freeze/thaw scenario. SGI-PV: 942533 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26815a Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
one page. SGI-PV: 955302 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26800a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
ramdisks. SGI-PV: 954802 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26627a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
flags from iclog buffers before submitting them for writing. SGI-PV: 954772 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26605a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 28 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 904196 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26366a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
pure bloat. SGI-PV: 952969 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26251a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 953338 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26109a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 9533338 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26106a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
shutdown vop flags consistent with sync vop flags declarations too. SGI-PV: 939911 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26096a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
these typos. SGI-PV: 904196 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25539a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
This patch removes pointless parentheses from return statements. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 11 1月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Shimmin 提交于
get more useful error info on space for trans items SGI-PV: 947110 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:24886a Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
SGI-PV: 946205 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:203360a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
SGI-PV: 946611 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:203307a Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2005 6 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 944821 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:24213a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
boilerplate. SGI-PV: 913862 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23903a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 943122 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
/proc/mounts. SGI-PV: 942984 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23862a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
writes. In addition flush the disk cache on fsync if the sync cached operation didn't sync the log to disk (this requires some additional bookeping in the transaction and log code). If the device doesn't claim to support barriers, the filesystem has an extern log volume or the trial superblock write with barriers enabled failed we disable barriers and print a warning. We should probably fail the mount completely, but that could lead to nasty boot failures for the root filesystem. Not enabled by default yet, needs more destructive testing first. SGI-PV: 912426 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:198723a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
SGI-PV: 942243 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:198658a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 02 9月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Shimmin 提交于
SGI-PV: 931456 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23155a Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Tim Shimmin 提交于
include all the components which make up the transaction in the ondisk log. Having this incomplete has shown up as problems on IRIX when some v2 log changes went in. The symptom was the msg of "xfs_log_write: reservation ran out. Need to up reservation" and was seen on synchronous writes on files with lots of holes (and therefore lots of extents). SGI-PV: 931457 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23095a Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 21 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
SGI-PV: 936255 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:192760a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-