Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 07 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 28 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 27 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 26 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      ipv4: ipv6: better estimate tunnel header cut for correct ufo handling · 91a48a2e
      由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于 
      Currently the UFO fragmentation process does not correctly handle inner
UDP frames.

(The following tcpdumps are captured on the parent interface with ufo
disabled while tunnel has ufo enabled, 2000 bytes payload, mtu 1280,
both sit device):

IPv6:
16:39:10.031613 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 3208, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IPv6 (41), length 1300)
    192.168.122.151 > 1.1.1.1: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header Fragment (44) payload length: 1240) 2001::1 > 2001::8: frag (0x00000001:0|1232) 44883 > distinct: UDP, length 2000
16:39:10.031709 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 3209, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IPv6 (41), length 844)
    192.168.122.151 > 1.1.1.1: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header Fragment (44) payload length: 784) 2001::1 > 2001::8: frag (0x00000001:0|776) 58979 > 46366: UDP, length 5471

We can see that fragmentation header offset is not correctly updated.
(fragmentation id handling is corrected by 916e4cf4 ("ipv6: reuse
ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data")).

IPv4:
16:39:57.737761 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 3209, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IPIP (4), length 1296)
    192.168.122.151 > 1.1.1.1: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 57034, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 1276)
    192.168.99.1.35961 > 192.168.99.2.distinct: UDP, length 2000
16:39:57.738028 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 3210, offset 0, flags [DF], proto IPIP (4), length 792)
    192.168.122.151 > 1.1.1.1: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 57035, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 772)
    192.168.99.1.13531 > 192.168.99.2.20653: UDP, length 51109

In this case fragmentation id is incremented and offset is not updated.

First, I aligned inet_gso_segment and ipv6_gso_segment:
* align naming of flags
* ipv6_gso_segment: setting skb->encapsulation is unnecessary, as we
  always ensure that the state of this flag is left untouched when
  returning from upper gso segmenation function
* ipv6_gso_segment: move skb_reset_inner_headers below updating the
  fragmentation header data, we don't care for updating fragmentation
  header data
* remove currently unneeded comment indicating skb->encapsulation might
  get changed by upper gso_segment callback (gre and udp-tunnel reset
  encapsulation after segmentation on each fragment)

If we encounter an IPIP or SIT gso skb we now check for the protocol ==
IPPROTO_UDP and that we at least have already traversed another ip(6)
protocol header.

The reason why we have to special case GSO_IPIP and GSO_SIT is that
we reset skb->encapsulation to 0 while skb_mac_gso_segment the inner
protocol of GSO_UDP_TUNNEL or GSO_GRE packets.
Reported-by: NWolfgang Walter <linux@stwm.de>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      91a48a2e
  13. 22 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 21 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 20 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 18 2月, 2014 4 次提交
  23. 17 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 15 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 14 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      net: ip, ipv6: handle gso skbs in forwarding path · fe6cc55f
      由 Florian Westphal 提交于 
      Marcelo Ricardo Leitner reported problems when the forwarding link path
has a lower mtu than the incoming one if the inbound interface supports GRO.

Given:
Host <mtu1500> R1 <mtu1200> R2

Host sends tcp stream which is routed via R1 and R2.  R1 performs GRO.

In this case, the kernel will fail to send ICMP fragmentation needed
messages (or pkt too big for ipv6), as GSO packets currently bypass dstmtu
checks in forward path. Instead, Linux tries to send out packets exceeding
the mtu.

When locking route MTU on Host (i.e., no ipv4 DF bit set), R1 does
not fragment the packets when forwarding, and again tries to send out
packets exceeding R1-R2 link mtu.

This alters the forwarding dstmtu checks to take the individual gso
segment lengths into account.

For ipv6, we send out pkt too big error for gso if the individual
segments are too big.

For ipv4, we either send icmp fragmentation needed, or, if the DF bit
is not set, perform software segmentation and let the output path
create fragments when the packet is leaving the machine.
It is not 100% correct as the error message will contain the headers of
the GRO skb instead of the original/segmented one, but it seems to
work fine in my (limited) tests.

Eric Dumazet suggested to simply shrink mss via ->gso_size to avoid
sofware segmentation.

However it turns out that skb_segment() assumes skb nr_frags is related
to mss size so we would BUG there.  I don't want to mess with it considering
Herbert and Eric disagree on what the correct behavior should be.

Hannes Frederic Sowa notes that when we would shrink gso_size
skb_segment would then also need to deal with the case where
SKB_MAX_FRAGS would be exceeded.

This uses sofware segmentation in the forward path when we hit ipv4
non-DF packets and the outgoing link mtu is too small.  Its not perfect,
but given the lack of bug reports wrt. GRO fwd being broken this is a
rare case anyway.  Also its not like this could not be improved later
once the dust settles.
Acked-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Reported-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fe6cc55f
  29. 12 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  31. 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  33. 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  35. 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • H
      net: Fix memory leak if TPROXY used with TCP early demux · a452ce34
      由 Holger Eitzenberger 提交于 
      I see a memory leak when using a transparent HTTP proxy using TPROXY
together with TCP early demux and Kernel v3.8.13.15 (Ubuntu stable):

unreferenced object 0xffff88008cba4a40 (size 1696):
  comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294944115 (age 8907.520s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    0a e0 20 6a 40 04 1b 37 92 be 32 e2 e8 b4 00 00  .. j@..7..2.....
    02 00 07 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff810b710a>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xad/0xb9
    [<ffffffff81270185>] sk_prot_alloc+0x29/0xc5
    [<ffffffff812702cf>] sk_clone_lock+0x14/0x283
    [<ffffffff812aaf3a>] inet_csk_clone_lock+0xf/0x7b
    [<ffffffff8129a893>] netlink_broadcast+0x14/0x16
    [<ffffffff812c1573>] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x1b/0x4c3
    [<ffffffff812c033e>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x38/0x25d
    [<ffffffff812c13e4>] tcp_check_req+0x25c/0x3d0
    [<ffffffff812bf87a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x287/0x40e
    [<ffffffff812a08a7>] ip_route_input_noref+0x843/0xa55
    [<ffffffff812bfeca>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x4c9/0x725
    [<ffffffff812a26f4>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xe9/0x154
    [<ffffffff8127a927>] __netif_receive_skb+0x4b2/0x514
    [<ffffffff8127aa77>] process_backlog+0xee/0x1c5
    [<ffffffff8127c949>] net_rx_action+0xa7/0x200
    [<ffffffff81209d86>] add_interrupt_randomness+0x39/0x157

But there are many more, resulting in the machine going OOM after some
days.

From looking at the TPROXY code, and with help from Florian, I see
that the memory leak is introduced in tcp_v4_early_demux():

  void tcp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
  {
    /* ... */

    iph = ip_hdr(skb);
    th = tcp_hdr(skb);

    if (th->doff < sizeof(struct tcphdr) / 4)
        return;

    sk = __inet_lookup_established(dev_net(skb->dev), &tcp_hashinfo,
                       iph->saddr, th->source,
                       iph->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
                       skb->skb_iif);
    if (sk) {
        skb->sk = sk;

where the socket is assigned unconditionally to skb->sk, also bumping
the refcnt on it.  This is problematic, because in our case the skb
has already a socket assigned in the TPROXY target.  This then results
in the leak I see.

The very same issue seems to be with IPv6, but haven't tested.
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NHolger Eitzenberger <holger@eitzenberger.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a452ce34
  37. 25 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 23 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 22 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  43. 20 1月, 2014 5 次提交
  45. 19 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  47. 18 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  49. 16 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      ipv6 addrconf: don't cleanup prefix route for IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE · 5b84efec
      由 Thomas Haller 提交于 
      Refactor the deletion/update of prefix routes when removing an
address. Now also consider IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE and if there is an address
present with this flag, to not cleanup the route. Instead, assume
that userspace is taking care of this route.

Also perform the same cleanup, when userspace changes an existing address
to add NOPREFIXROUTE (to an address that didn't have this flag). This is
done because when the address was added, a prefix route was created for it.
Since the user now wants to handle this route by himself, we cleanup this
route.

This cleanup of the route is not totally robust. There is no guarantee,
that the route we are about to delete was really the one added by the
kernel. This behavior does not change by the patch, and in practice it
should work just fine.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5b84efec