1. 20 9月, 2008 5 次提交
  2. 18 9月, 2008 5 次提交
  3. 17 9月, 2008 4 次提交
  4. 16 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 15 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 14 9月, 2008 4 次提交
  7. 13 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • D
      sparc: Fix user_regset 'n' field values. · 7d4ee289
      David S. Miller 提交于
      As noticed by Russell King, we were not setting this properly
      to the number of entries, but rather the total size.
      
      This results in the core dumping code allocating waayyyy too
      much memory.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7d4ee289
    • D
      sparc64: Fix PCI error interrupt registry on PSYCHO. · 80a56ab6
      David S. Miller 提交于
      We need to pass IRQF_SHARED, otherwise we get things like:
      
      IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 33
      current handler: PSYCHO_UE
      Call Trace:
       [000000000048394c] request_irq+0xac/0x120
       [00000000007c5f6c] psycho_scan_bus+0x98/0x158
       [00000000007c2bc0] pcibios_init+0xdc/0x12c
       [0000000000426a5c] do_one_initcall+0x1c/0x160
       [00000000007c0180] kernel_init+0x9c/0xfc
       [0000000000427050] kernel_thread+0x30/0x60
       [00000000006ae1d0] rest_init+0x10/0x60
      
      on e3500 and similar systems.
      
      On a single board, the UE interrupts of two Psycho nodes
      are funneled through the same interrupt, from of_debug=3
      dump:
      
      /pci@b,4000: direct translate 2ee --> 21
       ...
      /pci@b,2000: direct translate 2ee --> 21
      
      Decimal "33" mentioned above is the hex "21" mentioned here.
      
      Thanks to Meelis Roos for dumps and testing.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      80a56ab6
  8. 12 9月, 2008 2 次提交
    • J
      x86: fix possible x86_64 and EFI regression · 0ad5bce7
      Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
      Russ Anderson reported a boot crash with EFI and latest mainline:
      
       BIOS-e820: 00000000fffa0000 - 00000000fffac000 (reserved)
      Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-00100-gec0c15af-dirty #5
      
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff80849195>] early_idt_handler+0x55/0x69
       [<ffffffff80313e52>] __memcpy+0x12/0xa4
       [<ffffffff80859015>] efi_init+0xce/0x932
       [<ffffffff80869c83>] setup_early_serial8250_console+0x2d/0x36a
       [<ffffffff80238688>] __insert_resource+0x18/0xc8
       [<ffffffff8084f6de>] setup_arch+0x3a7/0x632
       [<ffffffff808499ed>] start_kernel+0x91/0x367
       [<ffffffff80849393>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe3/0xe7
       [<ffffffff808492b0>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x0/0xe7
      
       RIP 0x10
      
      Such a crash is possible if the CPU in this system is a 64-bit
      processor which doesn't support NX (ie, old Intel P4 -based64-bit
      processors).
      
      Certainly, if we support such processors, then we should start with
      _PAGE_NX initially clear in __supported_pte_flags, and then set it once
      we've established that the processor does indeed support NX.  That will
      prevent early_ioremap - or anything else - from trying to set it.
      
      The simple fix is to simply call check_efer() earlier.
      Reported-by: NRuss Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0ad5bce7
    • D
      MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt() · d1c6d2e5
      David Howells 提交于
      Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than
      in_interrupt() as commit 6edaf68a did for other
      architectures:
      
      	Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      	Date:   Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800
      
      	[PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic()
      
      	In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've
      	gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the
      	inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected.
      
      	Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user)
      	rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt
      	count.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d1c6d2e5
  9. 11 9月, 2008 11 次提交
  10. 10 9月, 2008 3 次提交
    • J
      arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c: introduce missing kfree · f461a1d8
      Julia Lawall 提交于
      Error handling code following a kmalloc should free the allocated data.
      Note that at the point of the change, node has not yet been stored in d, so
      it is not affected by the existing cleanup code.
      
      The semantic match that finds the problem is as follows:
      (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
      
      // <smpl>
      @r exists@
      local idexpression x;
      statement S;
      expression E;
      identifier f,l;
      position p1,p2;
      expression *ptr != NULL;
      @@
      
      (
      if ((x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\)(...)) == NULL) S
      |
      x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\)(...);
      ...
      if (x == NULL) S
      )
      <... when != x
           when != if (...) { <+...x...+> }
      x->f = E
      ...>
      (
       return \(0\|<+...x...+>\|ptr\);
      |
       return@p2 ...;
      )
      
      @script:python@
      p1 << r.p1;
      p2 << r.p2;
      @@
      
      print "* file: %s kmalloc %s return %s" % (p1[0].file,p1[0].line,p2[0].line)
      // </smpl>
      Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f461a1d8
    • P
      x86: fix memmap=exactmap boot argument · d6be118a
      Prarit Bhargava 提交于
      When using kdump modifying the e820 map is yielding strange results.
      
      For example starting with
      
       BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
       BIOS-e820: 0000000000000100 - 0000000000093400 (usable)
       BIOS-e820: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
       BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable)
       BIOS-e820: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data)
       BIOS-e820: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS)
       BIOS-e820: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved)
       BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
       BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
       BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
       BIOS-e820: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
      
      and booting with args
      
      memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K memmap=5228K@16384K memmap=125188K@22252K memmap=76K#1047424K memmap=564K#1047500K
      
      resulted in:
      
       user-defined physical RAM map:
       user: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000093400 (usable)
       user: 0000000000093400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
       user: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fee0000 (usable)
       user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003fef3000 (ACPI data)
       user: 000000003fef3000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI NVS)
       user: 000000003ff80000 - 0000000040000000 (reserved)
       user: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
       user: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
       user: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
       user: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
      
      But should have resulted in:
      
       user-defined physical RAM map:
       user: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable)
       user: 0000000001000000 - 000000000151b000 (usable)
       user: 00000000015bb000 - 0000000008ffc000 (usable)
       user: 000000003fee0000 - 000000003ff80000 (ACPI data)
      
      This is happening because of an improper usage of strcmp() in the
      e820 parsing code.  The strcmp() always returns !0 and never resets the
      value for e820.nr_map and returns an incorrect user-defined map.
      
      This patch fixes the problem.
      Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d6be118a
    • J
      lib: Correct printk %pF to work on all architectures · deac93df
      James Bottomley 提交于
      It was introduced by "vsprintf: add support for '%pS' and '%pF' pointer
      formats" in commit 0fe1ef24.  However,
      the current way its coded doesn't work on parisc64.  For two reasons: 1)
      parisc isn't in the #ifdef and 2) parisc has a different format for
      function descriptors
      
      Make dereference_function_descriptor() more accommodating by allowing
      architecture overrides.  I put the three overrides (for parisc64, ppc64
      and ia64) in arch/kernel/module.c because that's where the kernel
      internal linker which knows how to deal with function descriptors sits.
      Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      deac93df
  11. 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交