1. 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer · 04b38d60
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      The btrfs clone ioctls are now adopted by other file systems, with NFS
      and CIFS already having support for them, and XFS being under active
      development.  To avoid growth of various slightly incompatible
      implementations, add one to the VFS.  Note that clones are different from
      file copies in several ways:
      
       - they are atomic vs other writers
       - they support whole file clones
       - they support 64-bit legth clones
       - they do not allow partial success (aka short writes)
       - clones are expected to be a fast metadata operation
      
      Because of that it would be rather cumbersome to try to piggyback them on
      top of the recent clone_file_range infrastructure.  The converse isn't
      true and the clone_file_range system call could try clone file range as
      a first attempt to copy, something that further patches will enable.
      
      Based on earlier work from Peng Tao.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      04b38d60
  2. 04 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 20 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 11 5月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      don't pass nameidata to ->follow_link() · 6e77137b
      Al Viro 提交于
      its only use is getting passed to nd_jump_link(), which can obtain
      it from current->nameidata
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6e77137b
    • A
      new ->follow_link() and ->put_link() calling conventions · 680baacb
      Al Viro 提交于
      a) instead of storing the symlink body (via nd_set_link()) and returning
      an opaque pointer later passed to ->put_link(), ->follow_link() _stores_
      that opaque pointer (into void * passed by address by caller) and returns
      the symlink body.  Returning ERR_PTR() on error, NULL on jump (procfs magic
      symlinks) and pointer to symlink body for normal symlinks.  Stored pointer
      is ignored in all cases except the last one.
      
      Storing NULL for opaque pointer (or not storing it at all) means no call
      of ->put_link().
      
      b) the body used to be passed to ->put_link() implicitly (via nameidata).
      Now only the opaque pointer is.  In the cases when we used the symlink body
      to free stuff, ->follow_link() now should store it as opaque pointer in addition
      to returning it.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      680baacb
  5. 08 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 16 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 08 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 02 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 22 5月, 2014 4 次提交
  10. 07 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 24 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 14 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      cifs: delay super block destruction until all cifsFileInfo objects are gone · 24261fc2
      Mateusz Guzik 提交于
      cifsFileInfo objects hold references to dentries and it is possible that
      these will still be around in workqueues when VFS decides to kill super
      block during unmount.
      
      This results in panics like this one:
      BUG: Dentry ffff88001f5e76c0{i=66b4a,n=1M-2} still in use (1) [unmount of cifs cifs]
      ------------[ cut here ]------------
      kernel BUG at fs/dcache.c:943!
      [..]
      Process umount (pid: 1781, threadinfo ffff88003d6e8000, task ffff880035eeaec0)
      [..]
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff811b44f3>] shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x33/0x60
       [<ffffffff8119f7fc>] generic_shutdown_super+0x2c/0xe0
       [<ffffffff8119f946>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x30
       [<ffffffffa036623a>] cifs_kill_sb+0x1a/0x30 [cifs]
       [<ffffffff8119fcc7>] deactivate_locked_super+0x57/0x80
       [<ffffffff811a085e>] deactivate_super+0x4e/0x70
       [<ffffffff811bb417>] mntput_no_expire+0xd7/0x130
       [<ffffffff811bc30c>] sys_umount+0x9c/0x3c0
       [<ffffffff81657c19>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      Fix this by making each cifsFileInfo object hold a reference to cifs
      super block, which implicitly keeps VFS super block around as well.
      Signed-off-by: NMateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Reported-and-Tested-by: NBen Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      24261fc2
  16. 25 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 14 7月, 2012 6 次提交
  18. 04 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 28 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  20. 04 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  21. 29 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  22. 13 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 19 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  24. 01 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      cifs: simplify refcounting for oplock breaks · ad635942
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      Currently, we take a sb->s_active reference and a cifsFileInfo reference
      when an oplock break workqueue job is queued. This is unnecessary and
      more complicated than it needs to be. Also as Al points out,
      deactivate_super has non-trivial locking implications so it's best to
      avoid that if we can.
      
      Instead, just cancel any pending oplock breaks for this filehandle
      synchronously in cifsFileInfo_put after taking it off the lists.
      That should ensure that this job doesn't outlive the structures it
      depends on.
      Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      ad635942
  25. 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers · 02c24a82
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
      in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
      the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
      file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
      ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
      sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
      individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
      Thanks,
      Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      02c24a82
  26. 13 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 15 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  28. 19 5月, 2011 1 次提交