If the regulator connected to the CPU voltage plane doesn't
support an OPP specified voltage with the acceptable tolerance
it's better to just disable the OPP instead of constantly
failing the voltage scaling later on.

Includes a fix to move initialization of opp_freq outside
the loop to avoid an endless loop from Geert Uytterhoeven.
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: NLucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The cpufreq-dt driver tries to get a regulator for each CPU. This
regulator is optional, but when not present, a scary message "failed
to get cpuX regulator" is displayed. To solve this, we reduce the
severity of the message from dev_warn() to dev_dbg() and we reword the
message to not be as scary.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This commit extends the cpufreq-dt driver to take a platform_data
structure. This structure is for now used to tell the cpufreq-dt
driver the layout of the clocks on the platform, i.e whether all CPUs
share the same clock or whether each CPU has a separate clock.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If cpufreq_generic_init() fails we jump into the resource
cleanup path which contains a of_node_put() call. Another
instance of this has already been called at that time
resulting a double decrement of the refcount.

Fix this by calling of_node_put() only after we are sure
that nothing has gone wrong.

Fixes: d2f31f1d "cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization code to ->init()"
Signed-off-by: NLucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The naming convention of this driver was always under the scanner, people
complained that it should have a more generic name than cpu0, as it manages all
CPUs that are sharing clock lines.

Also, in future it will be modified to support any number of clusters with
separate clock/voltage lines.

Lets rename it to 'cpufreq_dt' from 'cpufreq_cpu0'.
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently allocate_resources() supports only CPU0 and it would need to allocate
resources for any CPU going forward.

Add another argument to it, i.e. cpu, and update code accordingly.
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, we expect regulator name to be "cpu0", but as we are going to support
multiple cpu-blocks (all CPUs in a block share clock/voltage) later, we need to
pass some generic string instead of that.

For backwards compatibility try for "cpu0" first and if it fails, then try for
"cpu".
Suggested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently this driver only support platforms on which all CPUs share clock &
voltage lines and there is requirement to support platforms which have separate
clock & voltage lines for CPUs, like Qualcomm's Krait and ARM's big LITTLE.

Each group of CPUs sharing clock/voltage lines are represented by 'struct
cpufreq_policy' in cpufreq framework. And core calls ->init() once for each
policy.

Currently we do all initialization/allocation from probe() which wouldn't work
for above scenario. To make it work for these platforms, the first step is to
move all initialization/allocation to ->init() and add ->exit() to do the
reverse of it.

Also, remove all global variables and allocate space for them at runtime.

This patch creates 'struct private_data' for keeping all such information and
a pointer to that would be stored in policy->driver_data.

The changed probe() routine now tries to see if regulator/clocks are available
or we need to defer probe. In case they are available, it registers cpufreq
driver. Otherwise, returns with -EPROBE_DEFER.

We still *don't* support platforms with separate clock/voltage lines for CPUs.
This would be done in a separate patch later.
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We already have cpu_dev and is used at multiple places for printing errors using
dev_*(). But some prints are still using pr_*(). Lets make it consistent and
replace those pr_*() macros with dev_*() macros.
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, we defer probe if regulator_get() returned -EPROBE_DEFER, i.e.
regulator isn't registered yet. We do a dev_err() in this case. Sending a
message to the log on probe defer just duplicates what the driver core is
already doing. Convert it to dev_dbg() instead.

We should defer in case of clk_get() as well.

Current code already does it, but it wasn't intentional probably. Its just that
we are returning the right error with wrong print message.

Fix print message to convey right error.
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CPU clk is not optional for this driver and probe would fail if it couldn't find
a suitable clock.

And so, while calling clk_put() we don't need to validate clocks.
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Two people are maintaining it now, Viresh and Shawn. Add Viresh's details in
MODULE_AUTHOR() and copyright section.
Suggested-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

-EPROBE_DEFER is no real error. We are just waiting unti the necessary
components are ready. The driver core infrastructure will also print an
appropriate info message.

This patch changes the error message to a debug message.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

OPPs can be populated statically, via DT, or added at run time with
dev_pm_opp_add().

While this driver handles the first case correctly, it would fail to populate
OPPs added at runtime. Because call to of_init_opp_table() would fail as there
are no OPPs in DT and probe will return early.

To fix this, remove error checking and call dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table()
unconditionally.

Update bindings as well.
Suggested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.

Sachin recently found this problem with cpufreq-cpu0 driver when he was testing
it for Exynos.

Set this flag for cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
Reported-and-tested-by: NSachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This driver is using devres managed calls incorrectly, giving the cpu0
device as first parameter instead of the cpufreq platform device.
This results in resources not being freed if the cpufreq platform device
is unbound, for example if probing has to be deferred for a missing
regulator.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_generic_exit() is empty now and can be deleted.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(),
to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them.

This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them.
All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get()
and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init().
Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate()
as errors.  This is needed since subsequent patches will convert
clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather
than a signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates
higher than (2^31)-1 Hz.

Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of
zero will be considered a error.  All other values will be
considered valid rates.  The comparison against values less than
0 is kept to preserve the correct behavior in the meantime.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch changes the cpufreq-cpu0 driver to consider if
a cpu needs cooling (with cpufreq). In case the cooling is needed,
the cpu0 device tree node needs to be properly configured
with cooling device properties.

In case these properties are present,, the driver will
load a cpufreq cooling device in the system. The cpufreq-cpu0
driver is not interested in determining how the system should
be using the cooling device. The driver is responsible
only of loading the cooling device.

Describing how the cooling device will be used can be
accomplished by setting up a thermal zone that references
and is composed by the cpufreq cooling device.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..

They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.

All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:

int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
		unsigned int relation);

And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.

So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.

This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:

int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);

CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.

This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.

It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.
Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>

Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific
to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp.h
to pm_opp.h
Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) data structures are specific
to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_* data
structures in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent.

Affected structures are:
 struct opp
 enum opp_event

Minor checkpatch warning resulting of this change was fixed as well.
Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific to
device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_*
accessors in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent.

Affected functions are:
 opp_get_voltage
 opp_get_freq
 opp_get_opp_count
 opp_find_freq_exact
 opp_find_freq_floor
 opp_find_freq_ceil
 opp_add
 opp_enable
 opp_disable
 opp_get_notifier
 opp_init_cpufreq_table
 opp_free_cpufreq_table
Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.

This patch uses these generic routines in the cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the patch "cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator", cpu_reg
contains an error value if the regulator is not set, instead of NULL.
Accordingly, fix the remaining check for non-NULL cpu_reg.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit f837a9b5 "cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0:
remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes" assumed the pdev->dev is set to
cpu0 device in the platform code. But it actually points to the virtual
cpufreq-cpu0 platform device which is not present in the device tree.
Most of the information needed by cpufreq is stored in cpu0 DT node.
So cpu_dev must point to cpu0 device.

This patch fixes the wrong assignment to cpu_dev.
Reported-and-tested-by: NGuennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.

This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>

Since NULL could in theory be a valid regulator we ought to check for
IS_ERR() rather than for NULL. In practice this is unlikely to be an
issue but it's better for neatness.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the cpufreq-cpu0 driver is capable of coping without a software
controllable regulator and would be confused by a dummy one it should
use devm_regulator_get_optional() to ensure no dummy is provided.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>

clk_set_rate() isn't supposed to accept approximate frequencies, instead
a supported frequency should be obtained from clk_round_rate() and then
used to set the clock.
Signed-off-by: NGuennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We are freeing parent node in success cases but not in failure cases.
Let's do it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

With commit 1e4b545c, regulator_get will now return -EPROBE_DEFER
when the cpu0-supply node is present, but the regulator is not yet
registered.

It is possible for this to occur when the regulator registration
by itself might be defered due to some dependent interface not yet
instantiated. For example: an regulator which uses I2C and GPIO might
need both systems available before proceeding, in this case, the
regulator might defer it's registration.

However, the cpufreq-cpu0 driver assumes that any un-successful
return result is equivalent of failure.

When the regulator_get returns failure other than -EPROBE_DEFER, it
makes sense to assume that supply node is not present and proceed
with the assumption that only clock control is necessary in the
platform.

With this change, we can now handle the following conditions:
 a) cpu0-supply binding is not present, regulator_get will return
    appropriate error result, resulting in cpufreq-cpu0 driver
    controlling just the clock.
 b) cpu0-supply binding is present, regulator_get returns
    -EPROBE_DEFER, we retry resulting in cpufreq-cpu0 driver
    registering later once the regulator is available.
 c) cpu0-supply binding is present, regulator_get returns
    -EPROBE_DEFER, however, regulator never registers, we retry until
    cpufreq-cpu0 driver fails to register pointing at device tree
    information bug. However, in this case, the fact that
    cpufreq-cpu0 operates with clock only when the DT binding clearly
    indicates need of a supply is a bug of it's own.
 d) cpu0-supply gets an regulator at probe - cpufreq-cpu0 driver
    controls both the clock and regulator
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Parent node must be put after using it to balance its usage count. This was
missing in cpufreq-cpu0 driver. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And
their frequencies are always updated together.

Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but
the best place for this code is in cpufreq core.

This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for
all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently we are simply returning from target() if we encounter some error after
broadcasting CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE notifier. Which looks to be wrong as others might
depend on POSTCHANGE notifier for their functioning.

So, better broadcast CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notifier for these failure cases too,
but with old frequency.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>