- 02 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
copy write checks in __generic_file_aio_write to ceph_aio_write. To make these checks cover sync write path. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
There is deadlock as illustrated bellow. The fix is taking i_mutex before getting Fw cap reference. write truncate MDS --------------------- -------------------- -------------- get Fw cap lock i_mutex lock i_mutex (blocked) request setattr.size -> <- revoke Fw cap Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request currently has two callbacks. They inform the initiator of the request when we've received confirmation for the target osd that a request was received, and when the osd indicates all changes described by the request are durable. The only time the second callback is used is in the ceph file system for a synchronous write. There's a race that makes some handling of this case unsafe. This patch addresses this problem. The error handling for this callback is also kind of gross, and this patch changes that as well. In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is requested we want to add the request on the ceph inode's unsafe items list. Because items on this list must have their tid set (by ceph_osd_start_request()), the request added *after* the call to that function returns. The problem with this is that there's a race between starting the request and adding it to the unsafe items list; the request may already be complete before ceph_sync_write() even begins to put it on the list. To address this, we change the way the "safe" callback is used. Rather than just calling it when the request is "safe", we use it to notify the initiator the bounds (start and end) of the period during which the request is *unsafe*. So the initiator gets notified just before the request gets sent to the osd (when it is "unsafe"), and again when it's known the results are durable (it's no longer unsafe). The first call will get made in __send_request(), just before the request message gets sent to the messenger for the first time. That function is only called by __send_queued(), which is always called with the osd client's request mutex held. We then have this callback function insert the request on the ceph inode's unsafe list when we're told the request is unsafe. This will avoid the race because this call will be made under protection of the osd client's request mutex. It also nicely groups the setup and cleanup of the state associated with managing unsafe requests. The name of the "safe" callback field is changed to "unsafe" to better reflect its new purpose. It has a Boolean "unsafe" parameter to indicate whether the request is becoming unsafe or is now safe. Because the "msg" parameter wasn't used, we drop that. This resolves the original problem reportedin: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706Reported-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is supplied with a request, and an error is returned by ceph_osdc_wait_request(), a block of code is executed to remove the request from the unsafe writes list and drop references to capabilities acquired just prior to a call to ceph_osdc_wait_request(). The only function used for this callback is sync_write_commit(), and it does *exactly* what that block of error handling code does. Now in ceph_osdc_wait_request(), if an error occurs (due to an interupt during a wait_for_completion_interruptible() call), complete_request() gets called, and that calls the request's safe_callback method if it's defined. So this means that this cleanup activity gets called twice in this case, which is erroneous (and in fact leads to a crash). Fix this by just letting the osd client handle the cleanup in the event of an interrupt. This resolves one problem mentioned in: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
add getattr/setattr and xattrs related methods. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
-
由 Sam Lang 提交于
We don't need to use up entropy to choose an mds, so use prandom_u32() to get a pseudo-random number. Also, we don't need to choose a random mds if only one mds is available, so add special casing for the common case. Fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3579Signed-off-by: NSam Lang <sam.lang@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Implement layered read requests for format 2 rbd images. If an rbd image is a clone of a snapshot, the snapshot will be the clone's "parent" image. When an object read request on a clone comes back with ENOENT it indicates that the clone is not yet populated with that portion of the image's data, and the parent image should be consulted to satisfy the read. When this occurs, a new image request is created, directed to the parent image. The offset and length of the image are the same as the image-relative offset and length of the object request that produced ENOENT. Data from the parent image therefore satisfies the object read request for the original image request. While this code works, it will not be active until we enable the layering feature (by adding RBD_FEATURE_LAYERING to the value of RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Call the probe function for the parent device if one is present. Since we don't formally support the layering feature we won't be using this functionality just yet. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a flag to distinguish between object requests being done on standalone objects and requests being sent for objects representing rbd image data (i.e., object requests that are the result of image request). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We're going to need some more Boolean values for object requests, so create a flags bit field and use it to record whether the request is done. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Encapsulate the code that completes processing of an object request that's part of an image request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request is for a layered image (one with a parent image to which requests will be redirected if the target object of a request does not exist). The code that checks this flag will be added shortly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request originated from the Linux block layer (from blk_fetch_request()) or whether it was initiated in order to satisfy an object request for a child image of a layered rbd device. For image requests initiated by objects of child images we'll save a pointer to the object request rather than the Linux block request. For now, only block requests are used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are several Boolean values we'll be maintaining for image requests. Switch from the single write_request field to a general-purpose flags field, and use one if its bits to represent the direction of I/O for the image request. Define helper functions for setting and testing that flag. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
For an image object request we will need to know what offset within the rbd image the request covers. Record that when the object request gets created. Update the I/O error warnings so they use this so what's reported is more informative. Rename a local variable to fit the convention used everywhere else. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Compute the total number of bytes transferred for an image request--the sum across each of the request's object requests. To avoid contention do it only when all object requests are complete, in rbd_img_request_complete(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If any image object request produces a non-zero result, preserve that as the result of the overall image request. If multiple objects have non-zero results, save only the first one. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a new rbd feature bit defined for "fancy striping." Add it to the ones defined in the kernel client. Change RBD_FEATURES_ALL so it represents the set of all feature bits (rather than just the ones we support). Define a new symbol RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED to indicate the supported ones. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the data in a data item separate from the class and method names. This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now, and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough for now. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Change the names of the functions that put data on a pagelist to reflect that we're adding to whatever's already there rather than just setting it to the one thing. Currently only one data item is ever added to a message, but that's about to change. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2770Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch adds support to the messenger for more than one data item in its data list. A message data cursor has two more fields to support this: - a count of the number of bytes left to be consumed across all data items in the list, "total_resid" - a pointer to the head of the list (for validation only) The cursor initialization routine has been split into two parts: the outer one, which initializes the cursor for traversing the entire list of data items; and the inner one, which initializes the cursor to start processing a single data item. When a message cursor is first initialized, the outer initialization routine sets total_resid to the length provided. The data pointer is initialized to the first data item on the list. From there, the inner initialization routine finishes by setting up to process the data item the cursor points to. Advancing the cursor consumes bytes in total_resid. If the resid field reaches zero, it means the current data item is fully consumed. If total_resid indicates there is more data, the cursor is advanced to point to the next data item, and then the inner initialization routine prepares for using that. (A check is made at this point to make sure we don't wrap around the front of the list.) The type-specific init routines are modified so they can be given a length that's larger than what the data item can support. The resid field is initialized to the smaller of the provided length and the length of the entire data item. When total_resid reaches zero, we're done. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In place of the message data pointer, use a list head which links through message data items. For now we only support a single entry on that list. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Rather than having a ceph message data item point to the cursor it's associated with, have the cursor point to a data item. This will allow a message cursor to be used for more than one data item. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A message will only be processing a single data item at a time, so there's no need for each data item to have its own cursor. Move the cursor embedded in the message data structure into the message itself. To minimize the impact, keep the data->cursor field, but make it be a pointer to the cursor in the message. Move the definition of ceph_msg_data above ceph_msg_data_cursor so the cursor can point to the data without a forward definition rather than vice-versa. This and the upcoming patches are part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The bio is the only data item type that doesn't record its full length. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We know the length of our message buffers. If we get a message that's too long, just dump it and ignore it. If skip was set then con->in_msg won't be valid, so be careful not to dereference a null pointer in the process. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4664Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch: 15a0d7b libceph: record message data length did not enclose some bio-specific code inside CONFIG_BLOCK as it should have. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Finally! Convert the osd op data pointers into real structures, and make the switch over to using them instead of having all ops share the in and/or out data structures in the osd request. Set up a new function to traverse the set of ops and release any data associated with them (pages). This and the patches leading up to it resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Still using the osd request r_data_in and r_data_out pointer, but we're basically only referring to it via the data pointers in the osd ops. And we're transferring that information to the request or reply message only when the op indicates it's needed, in osd_req_encode_op(). To avoid a forward reference, ceph_osdc_msg_data_set() was moved up in the file. Don't bother calling ceph_osd_data_init(), in ceph_osd_alloc(), because the ops array will already be zeroed anyway. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This ends up being a rather large patch but what it's doing is somewhat straightforward. Basically, this is replacing two calls with one. The first of the two calls is initializing a struct ceph_osd_data with data (either a page array, a page list, or a bio list); the second is setting an osd request op so it associates that data with one of the op's parameters. In place of those two will be a single function that initializes the op directly. That means we sort of fan out a set of the needed functions: - extent ops with pages data - extent ops with pagelist data - extent ops with bio list data and - class ops with page data for receiving a response We also have define another one, but it's only used internally: - class ops with pagelist data for request parameters Note that we *still* haven't gotten rid of the osd request's r_data_in and r_data_out fields. All the osd ops refer to them for their data. For now, these data fields are pointers assigned to the appropriate r_data_* field when these new functions are called. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All calls of ceph_osdc_start_request() are preceded (in the case of rbd, almost) immediately by a call to ceph_osdc_build_request(). Move the build calls at the top of ceph_osdc_start_request() out of there and into the ceph_osdc_build_request(). Nothing prevents moving these calls to the top of ceph_osdc_build_request(), either (and we're going to want them there in the next patch) so put them at the top. This and the next patch are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This simply moves ceph_osdc_build_request() later in its source file without any change. Done as a separate patch to facilitate review of the change in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an osd request's outbound data. Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(), the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded. Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into the pagelist. This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created when the op is initialized instead. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch just trivially moves around some code for consistency. In preparation for initializing osd request data fields in ceph_osdc_build_request(), I wanted to verify that rbd did in fact call that immediately before it called ceph_osdc_start_request(). It was true (although image requests are built in a group and then started as a group). But I made the changes here just to make it more obvious, by making all of the calls follow a common sequence: osd_req_op_<optype>_init(); ceph_osd_data_<type>_init() osd_req_op_<optype>_<datafield>() rbd_osd_req_format() ... ret = rbd_obj_request_submit() I moved the initialization of the callback for image object requests into rbd_img_request_fill_bio(), again, for consistency. To avoid a forward reference, I moved the definition of rbd_img_obj_callback() up in the file. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd data for a request is currently initialized inside rbd_osd_req_create(), but that assumes an object request's data belongs in the osd request's data in or data out field. There are only three places where requests with data are set up, and it turns out it's easier to call just the osd data init routines directly there rather than handling it in rbd_osd_req_create(). (The real motivation here is moving toward getting rid of the osd request in and out data fields.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Currently an object request has its osd request's data field set in rbd_osd_req_format_op(). That assumes a single osd op per object request, and that won't be the case for long. Move the code that sets this out and into the caller. Rename rbd_osd_req_format_op() to be just rbd_osd_req_format(), removing the notion that it's doing anything op-specific. This and the next patch resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4658Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one of the entries in the the osd request's array. So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it would like to initialize. This better hides the details the op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use). Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used outside the osd client code, give it static scope. Also make it return the address of the specified op (so all the other init routines don't have to repeat that code). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request (for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive the response data from the operation. Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them after the op has been initialized. Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd operation rather than the request data in or out structure in places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify pointers are always set the way they're expected to be. This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before making that jump. This is the first in a series of patches that resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are fields "indata" and "indata_len" defined the ceph osd request op structure. The "in" part is with from the point of view of the osd server, but is a little confusing here on the client side. Change their names to use "request" instead of "in" to indicate that it defines data provided with the request (as opposed the data returned in the response). Rename the local variable in osd_req_encode_op() to match. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array that it builds in its request message. In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that information does not go over the wire. As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the wire-encoded version. This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in the message in places where that was previously used. The array will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP to 2 to reduce the size of the structure. The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary. Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed. It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-