1. 13 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  2. 11 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 10 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  4. 09 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 08 4月, 2008 5 次提交
    • I
      [TCP]: Don't allow FRTO to take place while MTU is being probed · 6adb4f73
      Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
      MTU probe can cause some remedies for FRTO because the normal
      packet ordering may be violated allowing FRTO to make a wrong
      decision (it might not be that serious threat for anything
      though). Thus it's safer to not run FRTO while MTU probe is
      underway.
      
      It seems that the basic FRTO variant should also look for an
      skb at probe_seq.start to check if that's retransmitted one
      but I didn't implement it now (plain seqno in window check
      isn't robust against wraparounds).
      Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6adb4f73
    • I
      [TCP]: tcp_simple_retransmit can cause S+L · 882bebaa
      Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
      This fixes Bugzilla #10384
      
      tcp_simple_retransmit does L increment without any checking
      whatsoever for overflowing S+L when Reno is in use.
      
      The simplest scenario I can currently think of is rather
      complex in practice (there might be some more straightforward
      cases though). Ie., if mss is reduced during mtu probing, it
      may end up marking everything lost and if some duplicate ACKs
      arrived prior to that sacked_out will be non-zero as well,
      leading to S+L > packets_out, tcp_clean_rtx_queue on the next
      cumulative ACK or tcp_fastretrans_alert on the next duplicate
      ACK will fix the S counter.
      
      More straightforward (but questionable) solution would be to
      just call tcp_reset_reno_sack() in tcp_simple_retransmit but
      it would negatively impact the probe's retransmission, ie.,
      the retransmissions would not occur if some duplicate ACKs
      had arrived.
      
      So I had to add reno sacked_out reseting to CA_Loss state
      when the first cumulative ACK arrives (this stale sacked_out
      might actually be the explanation for the reports of left_out
      overflows in kernel prior to 2.6.23 and S+L overflow reports
      of 2.6.24). However, this alone won't be enough to fix kernel
      before 2.6.24 because it is building on top of the commit
      1b6d427b ([TCP]: Reduce sacked_out with reno when purging
      write_queue) to keep the sacked_out from overflowing.
      Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Reported-by: NAlessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      882bebaa
    • I
      [TCP]: Fix NewReno's fast rexmit/recovery problems with GSOed skb · c137f3dd
      Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
      Fixes a long-standing bug which makes NewReno recovery crippled.
      With GSO the whole head skb was marked as LOST which is in
      violation of NewReno procedure that only wants to mark one packet
      and ended up breaking our TCP code by causing counter overflow
      because our code was built on top of assumption about valid
      NewReno procedure. This manifested as triggering a WARN_ON for
      the overflow in a number of places.
      
      It seems relatively safe alternative to just do nothing if
      tcp_fragment fails due to oom because another duplicate ACK is
      likely to be received soon and the fragmentation will be retried.
      
      Special thanks goes to Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de> who was
      lucky enough to be able to reproduce this so that the warning
      for the overflow was hit. It's not as easy task as it seems even
      if this bug happens quite often because the amount of outstanding
      data is pretty significant for the mismarkings to lead to an
      overflow.
      
      Because it's very late in 2.6.25-rc cycle (if this even makes in
      time), I didn't want to touch anything with SACK enabled here.
      Fragmenting might be useful for it as well but it's more or less
      a policy decision rather than mandatory fix. Thus there's no need
      to rush and we can postpone considering tcp_fragment with SACK
      for 2.6.26.
      
      In 2.6.24 and earlier, this very same bug existed but the effect
      is slightly different because of a small changes in the if
      conditions that fit to the patch's context. With them nothing
      got lost marker and thus no retransmissions happened.
      Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c137f3dd
    • I
      [TCP]: Restore 2.6.24 mark_head_lost behavior for newreno/fack · 1b69d745
      Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
      The fast retransmission can be forced locally to the rfc3517
      branch in tcp_update_scoreboard instead of making such fragile
      constructs deeper in tcp_mark_head_lost.
      
      This is necessary for the next patch which must not have
      loopholes for cnt > packets check. As one can notice,
      readability got some improvements too because of this :-).
      Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1b69d745
    • J
      nl80211: fix STA AID bug · 16f2e85d
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      This fixes the STA AID setting and actually makes hostapd/mac80211
      work properly in presence of power-saving stations.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      16f2e85d
  6. 05 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 04 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  8. 02 4月, 2008 9 次提交
    • P
      [VLAN]: Proc entry is not renamed when vlan device name changes. · 802fb176
      Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
      This may lead to situations, when each of two proc entries produce
      data for the other's device.
      
      Looks like a BUG, so this patch is for net-2.6. It will not apply to
      net-2.6.26 since dev->nd_net access is replaced with dev_net(dev)
      one.
      Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      802fb176
    • H
      [IPV6]: Fix ICMP relookup error path dst leak · f32c5f2c
      Herbert Xu 提交于
      When we encounter an error while looking up the dst the second
      time we need to drop the first dst.  This patch is pretty much
      the same as the one for IPv4.
      Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f32c5f2c
    • B
      IPv6: do not create temporary adresses with too short preferred lifetime · eac55bf9
      Benoit Boissinot 提交于
      From RFC341:
      A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
      Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units.  In particular, an
      implementation must not create a temporary address with a zero
      Preferred Lifetime.
      Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      eac55bf9
    • B
      IPv6: only update the lifetime of the relevant temporary address · c6fbfac2
      Benoit Boissinot 提交于
      When receiving a prefix information from a routeur, only update the
      lifetimes of the temporary address associated with that prefix.
      
      Otherwise if one deprecated prefix is advertized, all your temporary
      addresses will become deprecated.
      Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org>
      Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c6fbfac2
    • D
      bluetooth : __rfcomm_dlc_close lock fix · 1905f6c7
      Dave Young 提交于
      Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing.
      
      The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add:
      rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock
      
      In __rfcomm_dlc_close:
      d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change)
      
      There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking
      d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock
      
      The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for
      rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;"
      is enough.
      
      [  295.002046] =======================================================
      [  295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      [  295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1
      [  295.002046] -------------------------------------------------------
      [  295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  295.002046]  (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] but task is already holding lock:
      [  295.002046]  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock.
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}:
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
      [  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
      [  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
      [  295.002046]        [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80
      [  295.002046]        [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240
      [  295.002046]        [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90
      [  295.002046]        [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140
      [  295.002046]        [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60
      [  295.002046]        [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      [  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}:
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
      [  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
      [  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
      [  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
      [  295.002046]        [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
      [  295.002046]        [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]        [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
      [  295.002046]        [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
      [  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705:
      [  295.002046]  #0:  (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  #1:  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046] 
      [  295.002046] stack backtrace:
      [  295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1
      [  295.002046]  [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
      [  295.002046]  [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80
      [  295.002046]  [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
      [  295.002046]  [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
      [  295.002046]  [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
      [  295.002046]  [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
      [  295.002046]  [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
      [  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
      [  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130
      [  295.002046]  [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70
      [  295.002046]  [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0
      [  295.002046]  [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30
      [  295.002046]  [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm]
      [  295.002046]  [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
      [  295.002046]  [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
      [  295.002046]  [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
      [  295.002046]  =======================
      Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1905f6c7
    • D
      bluetooth : use lockdep sub-classes for diffrent bluetooth protocol · 68845cb2
      Dave Young 提交于
      'rfcomm connect' will trigger lockdep warnings which is caused by
      locking diffrent kinds of bluetooth sockets at the same time.
      
      So using sub-classes per AF_BLUETOOTH sub-type for lockdep.
      
      Thanks for the hints from dave jones.
      
      ---
      > From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
      > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400
      >
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm]
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm]
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188
      > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      ---
      Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      68845cb2
    • J
      [ROSE/AX25] af_rose: rose_release() fix · 4965291a
      Jarek Poplawski 提交于
      rose_release() doesn't release sockets properly, e.g. it skips
      sock_orphan(), so OOPSes are triggered in sock_def_write_space(),
      which was observed especially while ROSE skbs were kfreed from
      ax25_frames_acked(). There is also sock_hold() and lock_sock() added -
      similarly to ax25_release(). Thanks to Bernard Pidoux for substantial
      help in debugging this problem.
      Signed-off-by: NJarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NBernard Pidoux <bpidoux@free.fr>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4965291a
    • V
      mac80211: correct use_short_preamble handling · d43c7b37
      Vladimir Koutny 提交于
      ERP IE bit for preamble mode is 0 for short and 1 for long, not the other
      way around. This fixes the value reported to the driver via
      bss_conf->use_short_preamble field.
      Signed-off-by: NVladimir Koutny <vlado@ksp.sk>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      d43c7b37
    • J
      mac80211: trigger ieee80211_sta_work after opening interface · 64f851e4
      Jan Niehusmann 提交于
      ieee80211_sta_work is disabled while network interface
      is down. Therefore, if you configure wireless parameters
      before bringing the interface up, these configurations are
      not yet effective and association fails.
      
      A workaround from userspace is calling a command like
      'iwconfig wlan0 ap any' after the interface is brought up.
      
      To fix this behaviour, trigger execution of ieee80211_sta_work from
      ieee80211_open when in STA or IBSS mode.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Niehusmann <jan@gondor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      64f851e4
  9. 01 4月, 2008 3 次提交
  10. 31 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 29 3月, 2008 8 次提交