Under some complicated circumstances (boot, suspend, resume, attach
second display, suspend, resume, suspend, detach second display,
resume, suspend, attach second display, resume), the fb_set_suspend()
call can somehow result in a modeset being attempted before we're
ready for it and things blow up in fun ways.

Running display init first fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

There's Apple machines out there which (probably completely arbitrarily)
restrict each output path to a particular head.  This causes us to not
be able to locate the output data needed to power on/off the DP output
correctly.

We fix this by passing in a head index we know is valid (as opposed to
"head 0").
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

When gcc 4.8 inlines this function, it eats up 16 bytes on the stack
every time. Eventually we hit warnings because our stack grew too
much:

ramnve0.c:1383:1: error: the frame size of 1496 bytes is larger than
1024 bytes

We fix this by preventing inlining for this function.
Signed-off-by: NStéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

If init doesn't run then disp->outp might not be initialized, resulting
in an oops.
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Reported-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

I don't know of anything this fixes, but it seems wrong anyway.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Need to drm_vblank_get/put() the crtc involved in a
pending pageflip, or we might not get vblank irqs and
updates of vblank counts and timestamps for pageflip
events and flip completion.
Signed-off-by: NMario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The blob does not seem to write at that place for my NVAC, though it
does for my NV96, agreeing with what is done in the if/else structure
below. I guess someone forgot to remove the line when the if/else was
put in place.
Signed-off-by: NPierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The specified stride was not correct, resulting in erases overlapping
and part of the zcull regions being not erased at all.
Signed-off-by: NPierre Moreau <pierre.morrow@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Fixes (at least) PTHERM accesses timing out at higher clock speeds.

Values and registers taken from what the binary driver does.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We were sending the necessary state changes to unset the mode, but
never actually hit the big GO button unless another modeset happens
afterwards.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

And at the same time, obey the spec better wrt out-of-range requests.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

SOR_PWR has no effect to power-off DP links, unlike other SOR protocols.

Instead, on the source side, we cut power to the lanes after having put
the sink into D3.  Link training takes care of everything required to
bring it back again.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This previously worked for the most part due to userspace doing a
modeset in response to HPD interrupts.  This will allow us to
properly handle cases where sync is lost for other reasons, or if
userspace isn't caring.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Some kind of update?  Needed to make the power-down take effect at least.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We want to be able to power down the lanes for DPMS off.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Same place as for SOR, between detach and attach phases.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This will, at some point, be used to replace various bits and pieces of
code doing direct bios parsing.  For now, it'll just be used for some
DP improvements.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>