1. 31 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 06 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 05 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 04 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • G
      Drivers: mtd: remove __dev* attributes. · d8929942
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option.  As a result, the __dev*
      markings need to be removed.
      
      This change removes the use of __devinit, __devexit_p, and __devexit
      from these drivers.
      
      Based on patches originally written by Bill Pemberton, but redone by me
      in order to handle some of the coding style issues better, by hand.
      
      Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      d8929942
  5. 22 11月, 2012 5 次提交
  6. 27 3月, 2012 5 次提交
  7. 10 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 11 9月, 2011 5 次提交
  9. 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 17 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 23 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 04 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 18 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 20 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 11 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 23 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  20. 20 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 07 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  22. 02 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 30 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      [MTD] DataFlash: bugfix, binary page sizes now handled · 771999b6
      akpm@linux-foundation.org 提交于
      The wrong version of the "teach dataflash about binary density" patch
      just got merged (v2 not v3) ... this restores the missing updates:
      
        * Fix the cmdlinepart *regression* that caused testing failures (!!)
          by restoring the original part labels in relevant cases.
      
        * Don't reference things that don't exist (!)
      	- An opcode that doesn't even exist for DataFlash
      	- The part is "at45db642" not "at45db641"
      	- ID zero in this JEDEC table
      
        * Make the JEDEC probe routine report and handle errors better:
      	- If the SPI calls fail, return the error codes.
      	- Don't depend on ordering of table entries.
      	- Unrecognized ids are different from parts that have no ID.
                We won't actually know how to handle them correctly; display
      	  the ID and ignore the chip.
      
        * Move the original block comment about the "legacy" chip ID scheme
          back next to the code to which it applies ... not next to the new
          JEDEC query code, which uses an entirely different strategy.
      
        * Don't print a guessed erasesize; /proc/mtd has the real value.
      
      And add a few more comments.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
      Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
      Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      771999b6
  24. 05 6月, 2008 2 次提交
  25. 28 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  26. 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交