- 25 9月, 2008 21 次提交
-
-
由 Yan Zheng 提交于
This trivial patch contains two locking fixes and a off by one fix. --- Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Before setting an extent to delalloc, the code needs to wait for pending ordered extents. Also, the relocation code needs to wait for ordered IO before scanning the block group again. This is because the extents are not removed until the IO for the new extents is finished Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Checksum items are not inserted into the tree until all of the io from a given extent is complete. This means one dirty page from an extent may be written, freed, and then read again before the entire extent is on disk and the checksum item is inserted. The checksums themselves are stored in the ordered extent so they can be inserted in bulk when IO is complete. On read, if a checksum item isn't found, the ordered extents were being searched for a checksum record. This all worked most of the time, but the checksum insertion code tries to reduce the number of tree operations by pre-inserting checksum items based on i_size and a few other factors. This means the read code might find a checksum item that hasn't yet really been filled in. This commit changes things to check the ordered extents first and only dive into the btree if nothing was found. This removes the need for extra locking and is more reliable. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Stress testing was showing data checksum errors, most of which were caused by a lookup bug in the extent_map tree. The tree was caching the last pointer returned, and searches would check the last pointer first. But, search callers also expect the search to return the very first matching extent in the range, which wasn't always true with the last pointer usage. For now, the code to cache the last return value is just removed. It is easy to fix, but I think lookups are rare enough that it isn't required anymore. This commit also replaces do_sync_mapping_range with a local copy of the related functions. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
* In btrfs_delete_inode, wait for ordered extents after calling truncate_inode_pages. This is much faster, and more correct * Properly clear our the PageChecked bit everywhere we redirty the page. * Change the writepage fixup handler to lock the page range and check to see if an ordered extent had been inserted since the improperly dirtied page was discovered * Wait for ordered extents outside the transaction. This isn't required for locking rules but does improve transaction latencies * Reduce contention on the alloc_mutex by dropping it while incrementing refs on a node/leaf and while dropping refs on a leaf. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Data checksumming is done right before the bio is sent down the IO stack, which means a single bio might span more than one ordered extent. In this case, the checksumming data is split between two ordered extents. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Checksum items are not inserted until the entire ordered extent is on disk, but individual pages might be clean and available for reclaim long before the whole extent is on disk. In order to allow those pages to be freed, we need to be able to search the list of ordered extents to find the checksum that is going to be inserted in the tree. This way if the page needs to be read back in before the checksums are in the btree, we'll be able to verify the checksum on the page. This commit adds the ability to search the pending ordered extents for a given offset in the file, and changes btrfs_releasepage to allow ordered pages to be freed. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This changes the ordered data code to update i_size after the extent is on disk. An on disk i_size is maintained in the in-memory btrfs inode structures, and this is updated as extents finish. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The old data=ordered code would force commit to wait until all the data extents from the transaction were fully on disk. This introduced large latencies into the commit and stalled new writers in the transaction for a long time. The new code changes the way data allocations and extents work: * When delayed allocation is filled, data extents are reserved, and the extent bit EXTENT_ORDERED is set on the entire range of the extent. A struct btrfs_ordered_extent is allocated an inserted into a per-inode rbtree to track the pending extents. * As each page is written EXTENT_ORDERED is cleared on the bytes corresponding to that page. * When all of the bytes corresponding to a single struct btrfs_ordered_extent are written, The previously reserved extent is inserted into the FS btree and into the extent allocation trees. The checksums for the file data are also updated. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This allows us to delete an unlinked inode with dirty pages from the list instead of forcing commit to write these out before deleting the inode. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Mingming 提交于
Use btrfs_release_file instead of a put_inode call Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
2.6.18 seems to get caught in an infinite loop when cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue is called more than once, so this switches to cancel_delayed_work, which is arguably more correct. Also, balance_dirty_pages can run into problems with 2.6.18 based kernels because it doesn't have the per-bdi dirty limits. This avoids calling balance_dirty_pages on the btree inode unless there is actually something to balance, which is a good optimization in general. Finally there's a compile fix for ordered-data.h Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Using ilookup5 during data=ordered writeback could deadlock on I_LOCK. This saves a pointer to the inode instead. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This forces file data extents down the disk along with the metadata that references them. The current implementation is fairly simple, and just writes out all of the dirty pages in an inode before the commit. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-