- 11 7月, 2007 40 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently we force a synchronous call to __nfs_revalidate_inode() in nfs_inode_set_delegation(). This not only ensures that we cannot call nfs_inode_set_delegation from an asynchronous context, but it also slows down any call to open(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There appear to be some rogue servers out there that issue multiple delegations with different stateids for the same file. Ensure that when we return delegations, we do so on a per-stateid basis rather than a per-file basis. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Don't clobber the delegation info... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This ensures that nfs4_open_release() and nfs4_open_confirm_release() can now handle an eventual delegation that was returned with out open. As such, it fixes a delegation "leak" when the user breaks out of an open call. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The test for state->state == 0 does not tell you that the stateid is in the process of being freed. It really tells you that the stateid is not yet initialised... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently we do not check for the FMODE_EXEC flag as we should. For that particular case, we need to perform an ACCESS call to the server in order to check that the file is executable. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently we just use a 32-bit counter. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It is a void function... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also fix up the underestimate of fs_locations Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The maximum size depends on the filename size and a number of other elements which are currently not being counted. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That just confuses certain NFSv4 servers. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no justification for keeping a special spinlock for the exclusive use of the NFS writeback code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
They differ only slightly in the arguments they take. Why have they not been merged? Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We should almost always be deferencing the rpc_auth struct by means of the credential's cr_auth field instead of the rpc_clnt->cl_auth anyway. Fix up that historical mistake, and remove the macro that propagated it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Replace it with explicit calls to rpc_shutdown_client() or rpc_destroy_client() (for the case of asynchronous calls). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also ensure that nfs_inode ncommit and npages are large enough to represent all possible values for the number of pages. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a tag for requests that are waiting for a COMMIT Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The nfs_access_cache_shrinker may race with nfs_access_zap_cache(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also get rid of a redundant call to nfs_setattr_update_inode(). The call to nfs3_proc_setattr() already takes care of that. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The Linux NFS4 client simply skips over the bitmask in an O_EXCL open call and so it doesn't bother to reset any fields that may be holding the verifier. This patch has us save the first two words of the bitmask (which is all the current client has #defines for). The client then later checks this bitmask and turns on the appropriate flags in the sattr->ia_verify field for the following SETATTR call. This patch only currently checks to see if the server used the atime and mtime slots for the verifier (which is what the Linux server uses for this). I'm not sure of what other fields the server could reasonably use, but adding checks for others should be trivial. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
They disappeared some time around 2.6.18. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
nfs_symlink() allocates a GFP_KERNEL page for the pagecache. Most pagecache pages are allocated using GFP_HIGHUSER, and there's no reason not to do that in nfs_symlink() as well. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need to revalidate the fsid on the root directory. It suffices to revalidate it on the current directory. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use rpc_run_task() instead of doing it ourselves. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
nfs4_do_close() does not currently have any way to ensure that the user won't attempt to unmount the partition while the asynchronous RPC call is completing. This again may cause Oopses in nfs_update_inode(). Add a vfsmount argument to nfs4_close_state to ensure that the partition remains mounted while we're closing the file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
A number of race conditions may currently ensue if the user presses ^C and then unmounts the partition while an asynchronous open() is in progress. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-