提交 ff20e251 编写于 作者: P Paul E. McKenney

rcutorture: Add an rcu_busted to test the test

This commit adds a deliberately buggy RCU implementation into rcutorture
to allow easy checking that rcutorture correctly flags buggy RCU
implementations.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
上级 0af3fe1e
......@@ -371,6 +371,48 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_bh_ops = {
.name = "rcu_bh"
};
/*
* Don't even think about trying any of these in real life!!!
* The names includes "busted", and they really means it!
* The only purpose of these functions is to provide a buggy RCU
* implementation to make sure that rcutorture correctly emits
* buggy-RCU error messages.
*/
static void rcu_busted_torture_deferred_free(struct rcu_torture *p)
{
/* This is a deliberate bug for testing purposes only! */
rcu_torture_cb(&p->rtort_rcu);
}
static void synchronize_rcu_busted(void)
{
/* This is a deliberate bug for testing purposes only! */
}
static void
call_rcu_busted(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
{
/* This is a deliberate bug for testing purposes only! */
func(head);
}
static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_busted_ops = {
.init = rcu_sync_torture_init,
.readlock = rcu_torture_read_lock,
.read_delay = rcu_read_delay, /* just reuse rcu's version. */
.readunlock = rcu_torture_read_unlock,
.completed = rcu_no_completed,
.deferred_free = rcu_busted_torture_deferred_free,
.sync = synchronize_rcu_busted,
.exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_busted,
.call = call_rcu_busted,
.cb_barrier = NULL,
.fqs = NULL,
.stats = NULL,
.irq_capable = 1,
.name = "rcu_busted"
};
/*
* Definitions for srcu torture testing.
*/
......@@ -1371,7 +1413,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
int cpu;
int firsterr = 0;
static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
&rcu_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &srcu_ops, &sched_ops,
&rcu_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_busted_ops, &srcu_ops, &sched_ops,
};
torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &rcutorture_runnable);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册