mqueue: don't use kmalloc with KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE

KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is not a good threshold.  It is extremely high and
problematic.  Unfortunately, some silly drivers depend on this and we
can't change it.  But any new code needn't use such extreme ugly high
order allocations.  It brings us awful fragmentation issues and system
slowdown.
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <mkosaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJoe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ipc/mqueue.c

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static struct inode *mqueue_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
 			info->attr.mq_msgsize = attr->mq_msgsize;
 		}
 		mq_msg_tblsz = info->attr.mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg *);
-		if (mq_msg_tblsz > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
+		if (mq_msg_tblsz > PAGE_SIZE)
 			info->messages = vmalloc(mq_msg_tblsz);
 		else
 			info->messages = kmalloc(mq_msg_tblsz, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void mqueue_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	spin_lock(&info->lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < info->attr.mq_curmsgs; i++)
 		free_msg(info->messages[i]);
-	if (info->attr.mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg *) > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
+	if (is_vmalloc_addr(info->messages))
 		vfree(info->messages);
 	else
 		kfree(info->messages);