提交 fcd05b50 编写于 作者: H Heiko Carstens 提交者: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/kprobes: have more correct if statement in s390_get_insn_slot()

When checking the insn address wether it is a kernel image or module
address it should be an if-else-if statement not two independent if
statements.
This doesn't really fix a bug, but matches s390_free_insn_slot().
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
上级 faf499df
......@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int __kprobes s390_get_insn_slot(struct kprobe *p)
p->ainsn.insn = NULL;
if (is_kernel_addr(p->addr))
p->ainsn.insn = get_dmainsn_slot();
if (is_module_addr(p->addr))
else if (is_module_addr(p->addr))
p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
return p->ainsn.insn ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册