提交 f5580d8d 编写于 作者: H Hans Verkuil 提交者: Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] cec: accept two replies for CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC

The CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC message is special since it is the ONLY
CEC message that accepts two possible valid replies:

CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED and CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED.

So if the transmitted message is CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC and the remote
side replied with CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED or CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED,
then a msg->reply value of CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED or
CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED will match either reply.

I thought about either adding a second reply2 field, but that's ugly
for all other messages that have only one reply, and what if in the
future a new message is added that can have three replies?

Another option would be to add a cec_msg flag, but really, the combination
of CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED and a reply value of one of the two
possible replies already functions as a flag.

Another advantage of this approach is that it is safe to re-use a
cec_msg struct. No need to zero a flags field or a reply2 field.

So since this really is an exception in the CEC specification, I
decided to implement it as an exception as well.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
上级 3074fe4a
......@@ -142,6 +142,14 @@ result.
Feature Abort reply. In this case ``rx_status`` will either be set
to :ref:`CEC_RX_STATUS_TIMEOUT <CEC-RX-STATUS-TIMEOUT>` or
:ref:`CEC_RX_STATUS_FEATURE_ABORT <CEC-RX-STATUS-FEATURE-ABORT>`.
If the transmitter message is ``CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC`` then the ``reply``
values ``CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED`` and ``CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED``
are processed differently: either value will match both possible replies.
The reason is that the ``CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC`` message is the only CEC
message that has two possible replies other than Feature Abort. The
``reply`` field will be updated with the actual reply so that it is
synchronized with the contents of the received message.
* - __u8
- ``rx_status``
- The status bits of the received message. See
......
The reason why cec.c is still in staging is that I would like
to have a bit more confidence in the uABI. The kABI is fine,
no problem there, but I would like to let the public API mature
a bit.
TODOs:
Once I'm confident that I didn't miss anything then the cec.c source
can move to drivers/media and the linux/cec.h and linux/cec-funcs.h
headers can move to uapi/linux and added to uapi/linux/Kbuild to make
them public.
Hopefully this will happen later in 2016.
Other TODOs:
- There are two possible replies to CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC. How to handle that?
- Should CEC_LOG_ADDR_TYPE_SPECIFIC be replaced by TYPE_2ND_TV and TYPE_PROCESSOR?
And also TYPE_SWITCH and TYPE_CDC_ONLY in addition to the TYPE_UNREGISTERED?
This should give the framework more information about the device type
......
......@@ -958,6 +958,18 @@ void cec_received_msg(struct cec_adapter *adap, struct cec_msg *msg)
list_for_each_entry(data, &adap->wait_queue, list) {
struct cec_msg *dst = &data->msg;
/*
* The *only* CEC message that has two possible replies
* is CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC.
* In this case allow either of the two replies.
*/
if (!abort && dst->msg[1] == CEC_MSG_INITIATE_ARC &&
(cmd == CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED ||
cmd == CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED) &&
(dst->reply == CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_INITIATED ||
dst->reply == CEC_MSG_REPORT_ARC_TERMINATED))
dst->reply = cmd;
/* Does the command match? */
if ((abort && cmd != dst->msg[1]) ||
(!abort && cmd != dst->reply))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册