提交 f2dbcfa7 编写于 作者: K KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm: clean up for early_pfn_to_nid()

What's happening is that the assertion in mm/page_alloc.c:move_freepages()
is triggering:

	BUG_ON(page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page));

Once I knew this is what was happening, I added some annotations:

	if (unlikely(page_zone(start_page) != page_zone(end_page))) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "move_freepages: Bogus zones: "
		       "start_page[%p] end_page[%p] zone[%p]\n",
		       start_page, end_page, zone);
		printk(KERN_ERR "move_freepages: "
		       "start_zone[%p] end_zone[%p]\n",
		       page_zone(start_page), page_zone(end_page));
		printk(KERN_ERR "move_freepages: "
		       "start_pfn[0x%lx] end_pfn[0x%lx]\n",
		       page_to_pfn(start_page), page_to_pfn(end_page));
		printk(KERN_ERR "move_freepages: "
		       "start_nid[%d] end_nid[%d]\n",
		       page_to_nid(start_page), page_to_nid(end_page));
 ...

And here's what I got:

	move_freepages: Bogus zones: start_page[2207d0000] end_page[2207dffc0] zone[fffff8103effcb00]
	move_freepages: start_zone[fffff8103effcb00] end_zone[fffff8003fffeb00]
	move_freepages: start_pfn[0x81f600] end_pfn[0x81f7ff]
	move_freepages: start_nid[1] end_nid[0]

My memory layout on this box is:

[    0.000000] Zone PFN ranges:
[    0.000000]   Normal   0x00000000 -> 0x0081ff5d
[    0.000000] Movable zone start PFN for each node
[    0.000000] early_node_map[8] active PFN ranges
[    0.000000]     0: 0x00000000 -> 0x00020000
[    0.000000]     1: 0x00800000 -> 0x0081f7ff
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081f800 -> 0x0081fe50
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081fed1 -> 0x0081fed8
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081feda -> 0x0081fedb
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081fedd -> 0x0081fee5
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081fee7 -> 0x0081ff51
[    0.000000]     1: 0x0081ff59 -> 0x0081ff5d

So it's a block move in that 0x81f600-->0x81f7ff region which triggers
the problem.

This patch:

Declaration of early_pfn_to_nid() is scattered over per-arch include
files, and it seems it's complicated to know when the declaration is used.
 I think it makes fix-for-memmap-init not easy.

This patch moves all declaration to include/linux/mm.h

After this,
  if !CONFIG_NODES_POPULATES_NODE_MAP && !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
     -> Use static definition in include/linux/mm.h
  else if !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
     -> Use generic definition in mm/page_alloc.c
  else
     -> per-arch back end function will be called.
Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemlloft.net>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.25.x, 2.6.26.x, 2.6.27.x, 2.6.28.x]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 ada723dc
......@@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ static inline int pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
#endif
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
extern int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_IA64_DIG /* DIG systems are small */
# define MAX_PHYSNODE_ID 8
# define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES * 8)
......
......@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ paddr_to_nid(unsigned long paddr)
* SPARSEMEM to allocate the SPARSEMEM sectionmap on the NUMA node where
* the section resides.
*/
int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
int i, section = pfn >> PFN_SECTION_SHIFT, ssec, esec;
......
......@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static inline void get_memcfg_numa(void)
get_memcfg_numa_flat();
}
extern int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
extern void resume_map_numa_kva(pgd_t *pgd);
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
......
......@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ static inline __attribute__((pure)) int phys_to_nid(unsigned long addr)
#define node_end_pfn(nid) (NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn + \
NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages)
extern int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
#define FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE (64 * 1024 * 1024)
#define FAKE_NODE_MIN_HASH_MASK (~(FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE - 1UL))
......
......@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int __init compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes,
return shift;
}
int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
return phys_to_nid(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
......
......@@ -1041,10 +1041,23 @@ extern void free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid,
typedef int (*work_fn_t)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *);
extern void work_with_active_regions(int nid, work_fn_t work_fn, void *data);
extern void sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(int nid);
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
extern int early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP */
#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP) && \
!defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID)
static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
return 0;
}
#else
/* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
/* there is a per-arch backend function. */
extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
#endif
extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
extern void memmap_init_zone(unsigned long, int, unsigned long,
unsigned long, enum memmap_context);
......
......@@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ static int __meminit next_active_region_index_in_nid(int index, int nid)
* was used and there are no special requirements, this is a convenient
* alternative
*/
int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
int i;
......@@ -3005,6 +3005,12 @@ int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
return __early_pfn_to_nid(pfn);
}
/* Basic iterator support to walk early_node_map[] */
#define for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid) \
for (i = first_active_region_index_in_nid(nid); i != -1; \
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册