提交 ee4373e7 编写于 作者: J Jacob Keller 提交者: Jeff Kirsher

fm10k: fix iov_msg_lport_state_pf issue

When a VF issues an LPORT_STATE request to enable a port that is already
enabled, the PF will first disable the VF LPORT. Then it should
re-enable the VF again with the new requested settings. This ensures
that any switch rules are cleared by deleting the LPORT on the switch.
However, the flow is bugged because we actually check if the VF is
enabled at the end, and thus don't re-enable it. Fix the flow so that we
actually clear the enabled flags as part of our removal of the LPORT.
Signed-off-by: NJacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: NKrishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
上级 d18c4388
......@@ -1351,6 +1351,14 @@ s32 fm10k_iov_msg_lport_state_pf(struct fm10k_hw *hw, u32 **results,
err = fm10k_update_lport_state_pf(hw, vf_info->glort,
1, false);
/* we need to clear VF_FLAG_ENABLED flags in order to ensure
* that we actually re-enable the LPORT state below. Note that
* this has no impact if the VF is already disabled, as the
* flags are already cleared.
*/
if (!err)
vf_info->vf_flags = FM10K_VF_FLAG_CAPABLE(vf_info);
/* when enabling the port we should reset the rate limiters */
hw->iov.ops.configure_tc(hw, vf_info->vf_idx, vf_info->rate);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册