提交 ed21a384 编写于 作者: E Eyal Shapira 提交者: Luca Coelho

iwlwifi: mvm: rs: fix success ratio comparison in rs_get_best_rate

success_ratio is actually 128 * SR in percentage while
IWL_MVM_RS_SR_NO_DECREASE is 85%. Fix this by using RS_PERCENT().
This bug caused the if branch to be always executed. This in turn
led to always selecting a rate, following a column switch, in which
the expected throughput would exceed the best expected current throughput.
In some scenarios where the success ratio isn't >85% such a rate
could be too aggressive leading us to avoid the new column.
This has the potential of causing sub optimal performance.
Reported-by: NMoshe Harel <moshe.harel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEyal Shapira <eyalx.shapira@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
上级 40ce5ed1
......@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ static s32 rs_get_best_rate(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
u32 target_tpt;
int rate_idx;
if (success_ratio > IWL_MVM_RS_SR_NO_DECREASE) {
if (success_ratio >= RS_PERCENT(IWL_MVM_RS_SR_NO_DECREASE)) {
target_tpt = 100 * expected_current_tpt;
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
"SR %d high. Find rate exceeding EXPECTED_CURRENT %d\n",
......@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ static s32 rs_get_best_rate(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
} else {
target_tpt = lq_sta->last_tpt;
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
"SR %d not thag good. Find rate exceeding ACTUAL_TPT %d\n",
"SR %d not that good. Find rate exceeding ACTUAL_TPT %d\n",
success_ratio, target_tpt);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册