mm, numa: skip PTE-mapped THP on numa fault

We're going to have THP mapped with PTEs.  It will confuse
numabalancing.  Let's skip them for now.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NJerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/memory.c

@@ -3193,6 +3193,12 @@ static int do_numa_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/* TODO: handle PTE-mapped THP */
+	if (PageCompound(page)) {
+		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Avoid grouping on RO pages in general. RO pages shouldn't hurt as
 	 * much anyway since they can be in shared cache state. This misses