inotify: fix race when adding a new watch

In inotify_new_watch() the number of watches for a group is compared
against the max number of allowed watches and increased afterwards.  The
check and incrementation is not done atomically, so it is possible for
multiple concurrent threads to pass the check and increment the number
of marks above the allowed max.

This patch uses an inotify groups mark_lock to ensure that both check
and incrementation are done atomic.  Furthermore we dont have to worry
about the race that allows a concurrent thread to add a watch just after
inotify_update_existing_watch() returned with -ENOENT anymore, since
this is also synchronized by the groups mark mutex now.
Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c

@@ -636,7 +636,8 @@ static int inotify_new_watch(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 		goto out_err;
 
 	/* we are on the idr, now get on the inode */
-	ret = fsnotify_add_mark(&tmp_i_mark->fsn_mark, group, inode, NULL, 0);
+	ret = fsnotify_add_mark_locked(&tmp_i_mark->fsn_mark, group, inode,
+				       NULL, 0);
 	if (ret) {
 		/* we failed to get on the inode, get off the idr */
 		inotify_remove_from_idr(group, tmp_i_mark);
@@ -660,19 +661,13 @@ static int inotify_update_watch(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct inode *inod
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-retry:
+	mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
 	/* try to update and existing watch with the new arg */
 	ret = inotify_update_existing_watch(group, inode, arg);
 	/* no mark present, try to add a new one */
 	if (ret == -ENOENT)
 		ret = inotify_new_watch(group, inode, arg);
-	/*
-	 * inotify_new_watch could race with another thread which did an
-	 * inotify_new_watch between the update_existing and the add watch
-	 * here, go back and try to update an existing mark again.
-	 */
-	if (ret == -EEXIST)
-		goto retry;
+	mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }