提交 d09ca739 编写于 作者: E Eric Paris 提交者: James Morris

security: make LSMs explicitly mask off permissions

SELinux needs to pass the MAY_ACCESS flag so it can handle auditting
correctly.  Presently the masking of MAY_* flags is done in the VFS.  In
order to allow LSMs to decide what flags they care about and what flags
they don't just pass them all and the each LSM mask off what they don't
need.  This patch should contain no functional changes to either the VFS or
any LSM.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NStephen D. Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
上级 9cfcac81
......@@ -282,8 +282,7 @@ int inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
if (retval)
return retval;
return security_inode_permission(inode,
mask & (MAY_READ|MAY_WRITE|MAY_EXEC|MAY_APPEND));
return security_inode_permission(inode, mask);
}
/**
......
......@@ -2645,6 +2645,8 @@ static int selinux_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
mask &= (MAY_READ|MAY_WRITE|MAY_EXEC|MAY_APPEND);
if (!mask) {
/* No permission to check. Existence test. */
return 0;
......
......@@ -598,6 +598,8 @@ static int smack_inode_rename(struct inode *old_inode,
static int smack_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
struct smk_audit_info ad;
mask &= (MAY_READ|MAY_WRITE|MAY_EXEC|MAY_APPEND);
/*
* No permission to check. Existence test. Yup, it's there.
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册