printk: remove outdated comment

Comment about interesting interlocking between lockbuf_lock and
console_sem is outdated.

It was added in 2002 by commit a880f45a48be during conversion of
console_lock to console_sem + lockbuf_lock.

At that time release_console_sem() (today's equivalent is
console_unlock()) was indeed using lockbuf_lock to avoid races between
trylock on console_sem in printk() and unlock of console_sem.  However
these days the interlocking is gone and the races are avoided by
rechecking logbuf state after releasing console_sem.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

kernel/printk/printk.c

@@ -206,8 +206,7 @@ struct printk_log {
 };
 
 /*
- * The logbuf_lock protects kmsg buffer, indices, counters. It is also
- * used in interesting ways to provide interlocking in console_unlock();
+ * The logbuf_lock protects kmsg buffer, indices, counters.
  */
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(logbuf_lock);