bail out with ELOOP earlier in do_link loop

If we'd passed through 32 trailing symlinks already, there's
no sense following the 33rd - we'll bail out anyway.  Better
bugger off earlier.

It *does* change behaviour, after a fashion - if the 33rd happens
to be a procfs-style symlink, original code *would* allow it.
This one will not.  Cry me a river if that hurts you.  Please, do.
And post a video of that, while you are at it.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

fs/namei.c

@@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ struct file *do_filp_open(int dfd, const char *pathname,
 
 do_link:
 	error = -ELOOP;
-	if (flag & O_NOFOLLOW)
+	if ((flag & O_NOFOLLOW) || count++ == 32)
 		goto exit_dput;
 	/*
 	 * This is subtle. Instead of calling do_follow_link() we do the
@@ -1915,11 +1915,6 @@ struct file *do_filp_open(int dfd, const char *pathname,
 		__putname(nd.last.name);
 		goto exit;
 	}
-	error = -ELOOP;
-	if (count++==32) {
-		__putname(nd.last.name);
-		goto exit;
-	}
 	filp = do_last(&nd, &path, open_flag, flag, acc_mode, mode,
 		       pathname, &is_link);
 	__putname(nd.last.name);