提交 c3921ab7 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds

Add new 'cond_resched_bkl()' helper function

It acts exactly like a regular 'cond_resched()', but will not get
optimized away when CONFIG_PREEMPT is set.

Normal kernel code is already preemptable in the presense of
CONFIG_PREEMPT, so cond_resched() is optimized away (see commit
02b67cc3 "sched: do not do
cond_resched() when CONFIG_PREEMPT").

But when wanting to conditionally reschedule while holding a lock, you
need to use "cond_sched_lock(lock)", and the new function is the BKL
equivalent of that.

Also make fs/locks.c use it.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 96623697
......@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static int flock_lock_file(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *request)
* give it the opportunity to lock the file.
*/
if (found)
cond_resched();
cond_resched_bkl();
find_conflict:
for_each_lock(inode, before) {
......
......@@ -2037,13 +2037,13 @@ static inline int need_resched(void)
* cond_resched_lock() will drop the spinlock before scheduling,
* cond_resched_softirq() will enable bhs before scheduling.
*/
extern int _cond_resched(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
static inline int cond_resched(void)
{
return 0;
}
#else
extern int _cond_resched(void);
static inline int cond_resched(void)
{
return _cond_resched();
......@@ -2051,6 +2051,10 @@ static inline int cond_resched(void)
#endif
extern int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t * lock);
extern int cond_resched_softirq(void);
static inline int cond_resched_bkl(void)
{
return _cond_resched();
}
/*
* Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
......
......@@ -5525,7 +5525,6 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
} while (need_resched());
}
#if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)
int __sched _cond_resched(void)
{
if (need_resched() && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE) &&
......@@ -5536,7 +5535,6 @@ int __sched _cond_resched(void)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
#endif
/*
* cond_resched_lock() - if a reschedule is pending, drop the given lock,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册