提交 b72bdfa7 编写于 作者: D David Rientjes 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm, oom: add comment for why oom_adj exists

/proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely to avoid breaking existing userspace
binaries that write to the tunable.

Add a comment in the only possible location within the kernel tree to
describe the situation and motivation for keeping it around.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 c12176d3
......@@ -1032,6 +1032,16 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len);
}
/*
* /proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely for backwards compatibility with previous
* kernels. The effective policy is defined by oom_score_adj, which has a
* different scale: oom_adj grew exponentially and oom_score_adj grows linearly.
* Values written to oom_adj are simply mapped linearly to oom_score_adj.
* Processes that become oom disabled via oom_adj will still be oom disabled
* with this implementation.
*
* oom_adj cannot be removed since existing userspace binaries use it.
*/
static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册