locks: clarify posix_locks_deadlock
For such a short function (with such a long comment),
posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion. Attempt to
make it a bit clearer:
- Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never
pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and
caller_fl conflict)
- Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto.
- Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and
removing some uninteresting historical detail.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录