xfrm: policy: only use rcu in xfrm_sk_policy_lookup

Don't acquire the readlock anymore and rely on rcu alone.

In case writer on other CPU changed policy at the wrong moment (after we
obtained sk policy pointer but before we could obtain the reference)
just repeat the lookup.
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>

net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

@@ -1249,10 +1249,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 						 const struct flowi *fl)
 {
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
-	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	read_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+ again:
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	if (pol != NULL) {
 		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
@@ -1267,8 +1266,8 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 			err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol->security,
 						      fl->flowi_secid,
 						      policy_to_flow_dir(dir));
-			if (!err)
-				xfrm_pol_hold(pol);
+			if (!err && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(pol))
+				goto again;
 			else if (err == -ESRCH)
 				pol = NULL;
 			else
@@ -1277,7 +1276,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 			pol = NULL;
 	}
 out:
-	read_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return pol;
 }