tracing/ftrace: fix double calls to tracing_start()
Impact: fix a warning during preemptirqsoff selftests When the preemptirqsoff selftest fails, we see the following warning: [ 6.050000] Testing tracer preemptirqsoff: .. no entries found .. ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 6.060000] WARNING: at kernel/trace/trace.c:688 tracing_start+0x67/0xd3() [ 6.060000] Modules linked in: [ 6.060000] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G [ 6.060000] Call Trace: [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802460ff>] warn_slowpath+0xb1/0x100 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a8f5b>] ? trace_preempt_on+0x35/0x4b [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a37fb>] ? tracing_start+0x31/0xd3 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a37fb>] ? tracing_start+0x31/0xd3 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff80271e0b>] ? __lock_acquired+0xe6/0x1f2 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a37fb>] ? tracing_start+0x31/0xd3 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a3831>] tracing_start+0x67/0xd3 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a8ace>] ? irqsoff_tracer_reset+0x2d/0x57 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a4d1c>] trace_selftest_startup_preemptirqsoff+0x1c8/0x1f1 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff802a4798>] register_tracer+0x12f/0x241 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff810250d0>] ? init_irqsoff_tracer+0x0/0x53 [ 6.060000] [<ffffffff8102510b>] init_irqsoff_tracer+0x3b/0x53 This is because in fail case, the preemptirqsoff tracer selftest calls twice the tracing_start() function: int trace_selftest_startup_preemptirqsoff(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr) { if (!ret && !count) { printk(KERN_CONT ".. no entries found .."); ret = -1; tracing_start(); <----- goto out; } [...] out: trace->reset(tr); tracing_start(); <------ tracing_max_latency = save_max; return ret; } Since it is well handled in the out path, we don't need the conditional one. Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <1237159961-7447-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录