tracing: Add proper check for irq_depth routines

The check_irq_entry and check_irq_return could be called
from graph event context. In such case there's no graph
private data allocated. Adding checks to handle this case.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100924154102.GB1818@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>

[ Fixed some grammar in the comments ]
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c

@@ -888,12 +888,20 @@ check_irq_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags,
 		unsigned long addr, int depth)
 {
 	int cpu = iter->cpu;
+	int *depth_irq;
 	struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
-	int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
 
-	if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
+	/*
+	 * If we are either displaying irqs, or we got called as
+	 * a graph event and private data does not exist,
+	 * then we bypass the irq check.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS) ||
+	    (!data))
 		return 0;
 
+	depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
+
 	/*
 	 * We are inside the irq code
 	 */
@@ -926,12 +934,20 @@ static int
 check_irq_return(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags, int depth)
 {
 	int cpu = iter->cpu;
+	int *depth_irq;
 	struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
-	int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
 
-	if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
+	/*
+	 * If we are either displaying irqs, or we got called as
+	 * a graph event and private data does not exist,
+	 * then we bypass the irq check.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS) ||
+	    (!data))
 		return 0;
 
+	depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
+
 	/*
 	 * We are not inside the irq code.
 	 */