提交 a752359f 编写于 作者: Y Yi Zou 提交者: James Bottomley

[SCSI] libfc: fix sending REC after FCP_RESP is received

This is exposed in the case the FCP_DATA frames somehow got lost and fc_fcp got
the FCP_RSP, in fc_fcp_recv_resp(), since xfer_len is less than the expected_len
it resets the the timer to wait to 2 more jiffies in case the data frames are
already queued locally. However, for target does not support REC, it would just
send RJT w/ ELS_RJT_UNSUP. The rec response handler thus only clears the rport
flag for not doing REC later, but does not do fcp_io_complete() on the
associated fsp.

The fix is just check status of FCP_RSP being received already, i.e. using the
FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS flag, in fc_fcp_timeout before start sending REC. We should
have waited long enough if there is truely data frames queued locally.
Signed-off-by: NYi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Tested-by: NRoss Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
上级 ac166d2f
......@@ -1380,10 +1380,10 @@ static void fc_fcp_timeout(unsigned long data)
fsp->state |= FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
fc_fcp_rec(fsp);
else if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp);
else if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
fc_fcp_rec(fsp);
else
fc_fcp_recovery(fsp, FC_TIMED_OUT);
fsp->state &= ~FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册