提交 9c8bb6b5 编写于 作者: B Brian Gerst 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86: drop -fno-stack-protector annotations after pt_regs fixes

Now that no functions rely on struct pt_regs being passed by value,
various "no stack protector" annotations can be dropped.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 253f29a4
......@@ -24,24 +24,6 @@ CFLAGS_vsyscall_64.o := $(PROFILING) -g0 $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_hpet.o := $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_tsc.o := $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_paravirt.o := $(nostackp)
#
# On x86_32, register frame is passed verbatim on stack as struct
# pt_regs. gcc considers the parameter to belong to the callee and
# with -fstack-protector it copies pt_regs to the callee's stack frame
# to put the structure after the stack canary causing changes made by
# the exception handlers to be lost. Turn off stack protector for all
# files containing functions which take struct pt_regs from register
# frame.
#
# The proper way to fix this is to teach gcc that the argument belongs
# to the caller for these functions, oh well...
#
ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
CFLAGS_process_32.o := $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_vm86_32.o := $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_signal.o := $(nostackp)
CFLAGS_traps.o := $(nostackp)
endif
obj-y := process_$(BITS).o signal.o entry_$(BITS).o
obj-y += traps.o irq.o irq_$(BITS).o dumpstack_$(BITS).o
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册