提交 9b915181 编写于 作者: S Sunil Mushran 提交者: Joel Becker

ocfs2: Use a separate masklog for AST and BASTs

This patch adds a new masklog and uses it allow tracing ASTs and BASTs
in the dlmglue layer. This has been found to be very useful in debugging
cluster locking issues.
Signed-off-by: NSunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
上级 bc9838c4
......@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ static struct mlog_attribute mlog_attrs[MLOG_MAX_BITS] = {
define_mask(XATTR),
define_mask(QUOTA),
define_mask(REFCOUNT),
define_mask(BASTS),
define_mask(ERROR),
define_mask(NOTICE),
define_mask(KTHREAD),
......
......@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
#define ML_XATTR 0x0000000020000000ULL /* ocfs2 extended attributes */
#define ML_QUOTA 0x0000000040000000ULL /* ocfs2 quota operations */
#define ML_REFCOUNT 0x0000000080000000ULL /* refcount tree operations */
#define ML_BASTS 0x0000001000000000ULL /* dlmglue asts and basts */
/* bits that are infrequently given and frequently matched in the high word */
#define ML_ERROR 0x0000000100000000ULL /* sent to KERN_ERR */
#define ML_NOTICE 0x0000000200000000ULL /* setn to KERN_NOTICE */
......
......@@ -932,6 +932,10 @@ static int ocfs2_generic_handle_bast(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
lockres->l_blocking = level;
}
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, block %d, level %d, l_block %d, dwn %d\n",
lockres->l_name, level, lockres->l_level, lockres->l_blocking,
needs_downconvert);
if (needs_downconvert)
lockres_or_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED);
......@@ -1054,8 +1058,8 @@ static void ocfs2_blocking_ast(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb, int level)
BUG_ON(level <= DLM_LOCK_NL);
mlog(0, "BAST fired for lockres %s, blocking %d, level %d type %s\n",
lockres->l_name, level, lockres->l_level,
mlog(ML_BASTS, "BAST fired for lockres %s, blocking %d, level %d, "
"type %s\n", lockres->l_name, level, lockres->l_level,
ocfs2_lock_type_string(lockres->l_type));
/*
......@@ -1099,6 +1103,10 @@ static void ocfs2_locking_ast(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb)
return;
}
mlog(ML_BASTS, "AST fired for lockres %s, action %d, unlock %d, "
"level %d => %d\n", lockres->l_name, lockres->l_action,
lockres->l_unlock_action, lockres->l_level, lockres->l_requested);
switch(lockres->l_action) {
case OCFS2_AST_ATTACH:
ocfs2_generic_handle_attach_action(lockres);
......@@ -1111,8 +1119,8 @@ static void ocfs2_locking_ast(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb)
ocfs2_generic_handle_downconvert_action(lockres);
break;
default:
mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres %s: ast fired with invalid action: %u "
"lockres flags = 0x%lx, unlock action: %u\n",
mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres %s: AST fired with invalid action: %u, "
"flags 0x%lx, unlock: %u\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_action, lockres->l_flags,
lockres->l_unlock_action);
BUG();
......@@ -1145,8 +1153,8 @@ static void ocfs2_unlock_ast(struct ocfs2_dlm_lksb *lksb, int error)
mlog_entry_void();
mlog(0, "UNLOCK AST called on lock %s, action = %d\n", lockres->l_name,
lockres->l_unlock_action);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "UNLOCK AST fired for lockres %s, action = %d\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_unlock_action);
spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
if (error) {
......@@ -1497,7 +1505,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_cluster_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
BUG_ON(level == DLM_LOCK_IV);
BUG_ON(level == DLM_LOCK_NL);
mlog(0, "lock %s, convert from %d to level = %d\n",
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, convert from %d to %d\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_level, level);
/* call dlm_lock to upgrade lock now */
......@@ -3314,13 +3322,20 @@ static unsigned int ocfs2_prepare_downconvert(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
BUG_ON(lockres->l_blocking <= DLM_LOCK_NL);
if (lockres->l_level <= new_level) {
mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres->l_level (%d) <= new_level (%d)\n",
lockres->l_level, new_level);
mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres %s, lvl %d <= %d, blcklst %d, mask %d, "
"type %d, flags 0x%lx, hold %d %d, act %d %d, req %d, "
"block %d, pgen %d\n", lockres->l_name, lockres->l_level,
new_level, list_empty(&lockres->l_blocked_list),
list_empty(&lockres->l_mask_waiters), lockres->l_type,
lockres->l_flags, lockres->l_ro_holders,
lockres->l_ex_holders, lockres->l_action,
lockres->l_unlock_action, lockres->l_requested,
lockres->l_blocking, lockres->l_pending_gen);
BUG();
}
mlog(0, "lock %s, new_level = %d, l_blocking = %d\n",
lockres->l_name, new_level, lockres->l_blocking);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, level %d => %d, blocking %d\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_level, new_level, lockres->l_blocking);
lockres->l_action = OCFS2_AST_DOWNCONVERT;
lockres->l_requested = new_level;
......@@ -3339,6 +3354,9 @@ static int ocfs2_downconvert_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
mlog_entry_void();
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, level %d => %d\n", lockres->l_name,
lockres->l_level, new_level);
if (lvb)
dlm_flags |= DLM_LKF_VALBLK;
......@@ -3368,14 +3386,12 @@ static int ocfs2_prepare_cancel_convert(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
assert_spin_locked(&lockres->l_lock);
mlog_entry_void();
mlog(0, "lock %s\n", lockres->l_name);
if (lockres->l_unlock_action == OCFS2_UNLOCK_CANCEL_CONVERT) {
/* If we're already trying to cancel a lock conversion
* then just drop the spinlock and allow the caller to
* requeue this lock. */
mlog(0, "Lockres %s, skip convert\n", lockres->l_name);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, skip convert\n", lockres->l_name);
return 0;
}
......@@ -3390,6 +3406,8 @@ static int ocfs2_prepare_cancel_convert(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
"lock %s, invalid flags: 0x%lx\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_flags);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s\n", lockres->l_name);
return 1;
}
......@@ -3399,7 +3417,6 @@ static int ocfs2_cancel_convert(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
int ret;
mlog_entry_void();
mlog(0, "lock %s\n", lockres->l_name);
ret = ocfs2_dlm_unlock(osb->cconn, &lockres->l_lksb,
DLM_LKF_CANCEL);
......@@ -3408,7 +3425,7 @@ static int ocfs2_cancel_convert(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
ocfs2_recover_from_dlm_error(lockres, 0);
}
mlog(0, "lock %s return from ocfs2_dlm_unlock\n", lockres->l_name);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s\n", lockres->l_name);
mlog_exit(ret);
return ret;
......@@ -3465,8 +3482,11 @@ static int ocfs2_unblock_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
* at the same time they set OCFS2_DLM_BUSY. They must
* clear OCFS2_DLM_PENDING after dlm_lock() returns.
*/
if (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_PENDING)
if (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_PENDING) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, ReQ: Pending\n",
lockres->l_name);
goto leave_requeue;
}
ctl->requeue = 1;
ret = ocfs2_prepare_cancel_convert(osb, lockres);
......@@ -3498,6 +3518,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unblock_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
*/
if (lockres->l_level == DLM_LOCK_NL) {
BUG_ON(lockres->l_ex_holders || lockres->l_ro_holders);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, Aborting dc\n", lockres->l_name);
lockres->l_blocking = DLM_LOCK_NL;
lockres_clear_flags(lockres, OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
......@@ -3507,28 +3528,41 @@ static int ocfs2_unblock_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
/* if we're blocking an exclusive and we have *any* holders,
* then requeue. */
if ((lockres->l_blocking == DLM_LOCK_EX)
&& (lockres->l_ex_holders || lockres->l_ro_holders))
&& (lockres->l_ex_holders || lockres->l_ro_holders)) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, ReQ: EX/PR Holders %u,%u\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_ex_holders,
lockres->l_ro_holders);
goto leave_requeue;
}
/* If it's a PR we're blocking, then only
* requeue if we've got any EX holders */
if (lockres->l_blocking == DLM_LOCK_PR &&
lockres->l_ex_holders)
lockres->l_ex_holders) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, ReQ: EX Holders %u\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_ex_holders);
goto leave_requeue;
}
/*
* Can we get a lock in this state if the holder counts are
* zero? The meta data unblock code used to check this.
*/
if ((lockres->l_ops->flags & LOCK_TYPE_REQUIRES_REFRESH)
&& (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_REFRESHING))
&& (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_REFRESHING)) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, ReQ: Lock Refreshing\n",
lockres->l_name);
goto leave_requeue;
}
new_level = ocfs2_highest_compat_lock_level(lockres->l_blocking);
if (lockres->l_ops->check_downconvert
&& !lockres->l_ops->check_downconvert(lockres, new_level))
&& !lockres->l_ops->check_downconvert(lockres, new_level)) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, ReQ: Checkpointing\n",
lockres->l_name);
goto leave_requeue;
}
/* If we get here, then we know that there are no more
* incompatible holders (and anyone asking for an incompatible
......@@ -3546,13 +3580,19 @@ static int ocfs2_unblock_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
ctl->unblock_action = lockres->l_ops->downconvert_worker(lockres, blocking);
if (ctl->unblock_action == UNBLOCK_STOP_POST)
if (ctl->unblock_action == UNBLOCK_STOP_POST) {
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, UNBLOCK_STOP_POST\n",
lockres->l_name);
goto leave;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
if ((blocking != lockres->l_blocking) || (level != lockres->l_level)) {
/* If this changed underneath us, then we can't drop
* it just yet. */
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, block=%d:%d, level=%d:%d, "
"Recheck\n", lockres->l_name, blocking,
lockres->l_blocking, level, lockres->l_level);
goto recheck;
}
......@@ -3963,7 +4003,7 @@ static void ocfs2_process_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
BUG_ON(!lockres);
BUG_ON(!lockres->l_ops);
mlog(0, "lockres %s blocked.\n", lockres->l_name);
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s blocked\n", lockres->l_name);
/* Detect whether a lock has been marked as going away while
* the downconvert thread was processing other things. A lock can
......@@ -3986,7 +4026,7 @@ static void ocfs2_process_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
} else
ocfs2_schedule_blocked_lock(osb, lockres);
mlog(0, "lockres %s, requeue = %s.\n", lockres->l_name,
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s, requeue = %s.\n", lockres->l_name,
ctl.requeue ? "yes" : "no");
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
......@@ -4008,7 +4048,7 @@ static void ocfs2_schedule_blocked_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
/* Do not schedule a lock for downconvert when it's on
* the way to destruction - any nodes wanting access
* to the resource will get it soon. */
mlog(0, "Lockres %s won't be scheduled: flags 0x%lx\n",
mlog(ML_BASTS, "lockres %s won't be scheduled: flags 0x%lx\n",
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_flags);
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册