cciss: fix proc warning on attempt to remove non-existant directory
Randy reports that he gets the following stack trace when removing the cciss module: [ 109.164277] Pid: 3463, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1 #7 [ 109.164280] Call Trace: [ 109.164292] [<ffffffff8107eb8d>] warn_slowpath_common+0xc6/0xf3 [ 109.164299] [<ffffffff8107ecaa>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5b/0x6b [ 109.164307] [<ffffffff8155175b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0x4b [ 109.164313] [<ffffffff8123dd1e>] remove_proc_entry+0x156/0x35e [ 109.164320] [<ffffffff812cd91b>] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xff/0x10f [ 109.164327] [<ffffffff8113823d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x4a [ 109.164333] [<ffffffff8155162d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x4c/0x7b [ 109.164339] [<ffffffff8154d4d1>] ? wait_for_common+0x145/0x15e [ 109.164345] [<ffffffff81075337>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x22 [ 109.164357] [<ffffffffa0615a8f>] cciss_cleanup+0xa9/0xc7 [cciss] [ 109.164365] [<ffffffff810d3cb0>] sys_delete_module+0x2d6/0x368 [ 109.164371] [<ffffffff8155036b>] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x35/0x67 [ 109.164377] [<ffffffff810fdfaf>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x172/0x1a5 [ 109.164383] [<ffffffff815502f5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 109.164389] [<ffffffff8100ea72>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 109.164394] ---[ end trace 88e8568246ed0b1d ]--- which will happen if you don't actually have an HP CISS adapter, since it'll do an uncondional removal of a proc directory it never attempted to create in that case. Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Tested-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录