PM / Documentation: remove inaccurate suspend/hibernate transition lantency statement

The lantency of the transition from suspend and hibernate is
platform-dependent.  Thus we should not refer the lantency in the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Documentation/power/states.txt

@@ -36,9 +36,6 @@ We try to put devices in a low-power state equivalent to D1, which
 also offers low power savings, but low resume latency. Not all devices
 support D1, and those that don't are left on. 
 
-A transition from Standby to the On state should take about 1-2
-seconds. 
-
 
 State:		Suspend-to-RAM
 ACPI State:	S3
@@ -56,9 +53,6 @@ transition back to the On state.
 For at least ACPI, STR requires some minimal boot-strapping code to
 resume the system from STR. This may be true on other platforms. 
 
-A transition from Suspend-to-RAM to the On state should take about
-3-5 seconds. 
-
 
 State:		Suspend-to-disk
 ACPI State:	S4
@@ -88,7 +82,3 @@ low-power state (like ACPI S4), or it may simply power down. Powering
 down offers greater savings, and allows this mechanism to work on any
 system. However, entering a real low-power state allows the user to
 trigger wake up events (e.g. pressing a key or opening a laptop lid).
-
-A transition from Suspend-to-Disk to the On state should take about 30
-seconds, though it's typically a bit more with the current
-implementation.