提交 81ae6d03 编写于 作者: V Vladimir Davydov 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm/slub.c: replace kick_all_cpus_sync() with synchronize_sched() in kmem_cache_shrink()

When we call __kmem_cache_shrink on memory cgroup removal, we need to
synchronize kmem_cache->cpu_partial update with put_cpu_partial that
might be running on other cpus.  Currently, we achieve that by using
kick_all_cpus_sync, which works as a system wide memory barrier.  Though
fast it is, this method has a flaw - it issues a lot of IPIs, which
might hurt high performance or real-time workloads.

To fix this, let's replace kick_all_cpus_sync with synchronize_sched.
Although the latter one may take much longer to finish, it shouldn't be
a problem in this particular case, because memory cgroups are destroyed
asynchronously from a workqueue so that no user visible effects should
be introduced.  OTOH, it will save us from excessive IPIs when someone
removes a cgroup.

Anyway, even if using synchronize_sched turns out to take too long, we
can always introduce a kind of __kmem_cache_shrink batching so that this
method would only be called once per one cgroup destruction (not per
each per memcg kmem cache as it is now).
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 801faf0d
......@@ -3697,7 +3697,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *s, bool deactivate)
* s->cpu_partial is checked locklessly (see put_cpu_partial),
* so we have to make sure the change is visible.
*/
kick_all_cpus_sync();
synchronize_sched();
}
flush_all(s);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册