提交 81841161 编写于 作者: C Cyrill Gorcunov 提交者: Linus Torvalds

fs, proc: introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry

When we do checkpoint of a task we need to know the list of children the
task, has but there is no easy and fast way to generate reverse
parent->children chain from arbitrary <pid> (while a parent pid is
provided in "PPid" field of /proc/<pid>/status).

So instead of walking over all pids in the system (creating one big
process tree in memory, just to figure out which children a task has) --
we add explicit /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry, because the kernel
already has this kind of information but it is not yet exported.

This is a first level children, not the whole process tree.
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 98ed57ee
......@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Table of Contents
3.4 /proc/<pid>/coredump_filter - Core dump filtering settings
3.5 /proc/<pid>/mountinfo - Information about mounts
3.6 /proc/<pid>/comm & /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/comm
3.7 /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children - Information about task children
4 Configuring procfs
4.1 Mount options
......@@ -1578,6 +1579,23 @@ then the kernel's TASK_COMM_LEN (currently 16 chars) will result in a truncated
comm value.
3.7 /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children - Information about task children
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This file provides a fast way to retrieve first level children pids
of a task pointed by <pid>/<tid> pair. The format is a space separated
stream of pids.
Note the "first level" here -- if a child has own children they will
not be listed here, one needs to read /proc/<children-pid>/task/<tid>/children
to obtain the descendants.
Since this interface is intended to be fast and cheap it doesn't
guarantee to provide precise results and some children might be
skipped, especially if they've exited right after we printed their
pids, so one need to either stop or freeze processes being inspected
if precise results are needed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuring procfs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
......
......@@ -565,3 +565,126 @@ int proc_pid_statm(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
static struct pid *
get_children_pid(struct inode *inode, struct pid *pid_prev, loff_t pos)
{
struct task_struct *start, *task;
struct pid *pid = NULL;
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
start = pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID);
if (!start)
goto out;
/*
* Lets try to continue searching first, this gives
* us significant speedup on children-rich processes.
*/
if (pid_prev) {
task = pid_task(pid_prev, PIDTYPE_PID);
if (task && task->real_parent == start &&
!(list_empty(&task->sibling))) {
if (list_is_last(&task->sibling, &start->children))
goto out;
task = list_first_entry(&task->sibling,
struct task_struct, sibling);
pid = get_pid(task_pid(task));
goto out;
}
}
/*
* Slow search case.
*
* We might miss some children here if children
* are exited while we were not holding the lock,
* but it was never promised to be accurate that
* much.
*
* "Just suppose that the parent sleeps, but N children
* exit after we printed their tids. Now the slow paths
* skips N extra children, we miss N tasks." (c)
*
* So one need to stop or freeze the leader and all
* its children to get a precise result.
*/
list_for_each_entry(task, &start->children, sibling) {
if (pos-- == 0) {
pid = get_pid(task_pid(task));
break;
}
}
out:
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
return pid;
}
static int children_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
struct inode *inode = seq->private;
pid_t pid;
pid = pid_nr_ns(v, inode->i_sb->s_fs_info);
return seq_printf(seq, "%d ", pid);
}
static void *children_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
{
return get_children_pid(seq->private, NULL, *pos);
}
static void *children_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct pid *pid;
pid = get_children_pid(seq->private, v, *pos + 1);
put_pid(v);
++*pos;
return pid;
}
static void children_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
put_pid(v);
}
static const struct seq_operations children_seq_ops = {
.start = children_seq_start,
.next = children_seq_next,
.stop = children_seq_stop,
.show = children_seq_show,
};
static int children_seq_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct seq_file *m;
int ret;
ret = seq_open(file, &children_seq_ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
m = file->private_data;
m->private = inode;
return ret;
}
int children_seq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
seq_release(inode, file);
return 0;
}
const struct file_operations proc_tid_children_operations = {
.open = children_seq_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = children_seq_release,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE */
......@@ -3400,6 +3400,9 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {
ONE("stat", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_stat),
ONE("statm", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_statm),
REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_maps_operations),
#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
REG("children", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_children_operations),
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_tid_numa_maps_operations),
#endif
......
......@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ extern int proc_pid_statm(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task);
extern loff_t mem_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig);
extern const struct file_operations proc_tid_children_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_maps_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_tid_maps_operations;
extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册