提交 75e252d9 编写于 作者: J Joy Latten 提交者: David S. Miller

[XFRM]: Fix missing protocol comparison of larval SAs.

I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
places without checking for protocol match. So when using both 
AH and ESP, whichever one gets added first, deletes the larval SA. 
It seems AH always gets added first and ESP is always the larval 
SA's protocol since the xfrm->tmpl has it first. Thus causing the
additional km_query()

Adding the check eliminates accidental double SA creation. 
Signed-off-by: NJoy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 ce0ecd59
...@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re ...@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re
x->props.mode != mode || x->props.mode != mode ||
x->props.family != family || x->props.family != family ||
x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_ACQ || x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_ACQ ||
x->id.spi != 0) x->id.spi != 0 ||
x->id.proto != proto)
continue; continue;
switch (family) { switch (family) {
...@@ -801,7 +802,8 @@ int xfrm_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x) ...@@ -801,7 +802,8 @@ int xfrm_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x)
if (use_spi && x->km.seq) { if (use_spi && x->km.seq) {
x1 = __xfrm_find_acq_byseq(x->km.seq); x1 = __xfrm_find_acq_byseq(x->km.seq);
if (x1 && xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family)) { if (x1 && ((x1->id.proto != x->id.proto) ||
xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family))) {
xfrm_state_put(x1); xfrm_state_put(x1);
x1 = NULL; x1 = NULL;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册