提交 72e15d71 编写于 作者: J Johannes Berg 提交者: Reinette Chatre

iwlwifi: change WEP key protection to use mutex

For later station notification support we would like WEP key setting to be
done synchronously always. Currently all places from which WEP key is set
can sleep, but the usage of sta_lock prevents it to do so. Modify the
locking to use priv->mutex instead and thus enable this call to sleep.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
上级 4967c316
......@@ -2869,7 +2869,6 @@ static int iwl_mac_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
iwl_scan_cancel_timeout(priv, 100);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
/* If we are getting WEP group key and we didn't receive any key mapping
* so far, we are in legacy wep mode (group key only), otherwise we are
......@@ -2905,6 +2904,7 @@ static int iwl_mac_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
ret = -EINVAL;
}
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
IWL_DEBUG_MAC80211(priv, "leave\n");
return ret;
......
......@@ -1220,7 +1220,7 @@ struct iwl_priv {
spinlock_t sta_lock;
int num_stations;
struct iwl_station_entry stations[IWL_STATION_COUNT];
struct iwl_wep_key wep_keys[WEP_KEYS_MAX];
struct iwl_wep_key wep_keys[WEP_KEYS_MAX]; /* protected by mutex */
u8 default_wep_key;
u8 key_mapping_key;
unsigned long ucode_key_table;
......
......@@ -549,9 +549,11 @@ int iwl_send_static_wepkey_cmd(struct iwl_priv *priv, u8 send_if_empty)
struct iwl_host_cmd cmd = {
.id = REPLY_WEPKEY,
.data = wep_cmd,
.flags = CMD_ASYNC,
.flags = CMD_SYNC,
};
might_sleep();
memset(wep_cmd, 0, cmd_size +
(sizeof(struct iwl_wep_key) * WEP_KEYS_MAX));
......@@ -587,9 +589,9 @@ int iwl_remove_default_wep_key(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct ieee80211_key_conf *keyconf)
{
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->sta_lock, flags);
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&priv->mutex));
IWL_DEBUG_WEP(priv, "Removing default WEP key: idx=%d\n",
keyconf->keyidx);
......@@ -601,13 +603,12 @@ int iwl_remove_default_wep_key(struct iwl_priv *priv,
memset(&priv->wep_keys[keyconf->keyidx], 0, sizeof(priv->wep_keys[0]));
if (iwl_is_rfkill(priv)) {
IWL_DEBUG_WEP(priv, "Not sending REPLY_WEPKEY command due to RFKILL.\n");
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->sta_lock, flags);
/* but keys in device are clear anyway so return success */
return 0;
}
ret = iwl_send_static_wepkey_cmd(priv, 1);
IWL_DEBUG_WEP(priv, "Remove default WEP key: idx=%d ret=%d\n",
keyconf->keyidx, ret);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->sta_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
......@@ -617,7 +618,8 @@ int iwl_set_default_wep_key(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct ieee80211_key_conf *keyconf)
{
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&priv->mutex));
if (keyconf->keylen != WEP_KEY_LEN_128 &&
keyconf->keylen != WEP_KEY_LEN_64) {
......@@ -629,12 +631,11 @@ int iwl_set_default_wep_key(struct iwl_priv *priv,
keyconf->hw_key_idx = HW_KEY_DEFAULT;
priv->stations[IWL_AP_ID].keyinfo.alg = ALG_WEP;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->sta_lock, flags);
priv->default_wep_key++;
if (test_and_set_bit(keyconf->keyidx, &priv->ucode_key_table))
IWL_ERR(priv, "index %d already used in uCode key table.\n",
keyconf->keyidx);
keyconf->keyidx);
priv->wep_keys[keyconf->keyidx].key_size = keyconf->keylen;
memcpy(&priv->wep_keys[keyconf->keyidx].key, &keyconf->key,
......@@ -643,7 +644,6 @@ int iwl_set_default_wep_key(struct iwl_priv *priv,
ret = iwl_send_static_wepkey_cmd(priv, 0);
IWL_DEBUG_WEP(priv, "Set default WEP key: len=%d idx=%d ret=%d\n",
keyconf->keylen, keyconf->keyidx, ret);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->sta_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -3344,7 +3344,6 @@ static int iwl3945_mac_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
iwl_scan_cancel_timeout(priv, 100);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
switch (cmd) {
case SET_KEY:
......@@ -3365,6 +3364,7 @@ static int iwl3945_mac_set_key(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum set_key_cmd cmd,
ret = -EINVAL;
}
mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
IWL_DEBUG_MAC80211(priv, "leave\n");
return ret;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册