提交 706026c2 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo

workqueue: post global_cwq removal cleanups

Remove remaining references to gcwq.

* __next_gcwq_cpu() steals __next_wq_cpu() name.  The original
  __next_wq_cpu() became __next_cwq_cpu().

* s/for_each_gcwq_cpu/for_each_wq_cpu/
  s/for_each_online_gcwq_cpu/for_each_online_wq_cpu/

* s/gcwq_mayday_timeout/pool_mayday_timeout/

* s/gcwq_unbind_fn/wq_unbind_fn/

* Drop references to gcwq in comments.

This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
上级 e6e380ed
......@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_freezable_wq);
#define for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, pool) \
hash_for_each(pool->busy_hash, i, pos, worker, hentry)
static inline int __next_gcwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
unsigned int sw)
static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
unsigned int sw)
{
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
if (sw & 1) {
......@@ -261,39 +261,39 @@ static inline int __next_gcwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
return WORK_CPU_NONE;
}
static inline int __next_wq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
struct workqueue_struct *wq)
static inline int __next_cwq_cpu(int cpu, const struct cpumask *mask,
struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
return __next_gcwq_cpu(cpu, mask, !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ? 1 : 2);
return __next_wq_cpu(cpu, mask, !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ? 1 : 2);
}
/*
* CPU iterators
*
* An extra gcwq is defined for an invalid cpu number
* An extra cpu number is defined using an invalid cpu number
* (WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) to host workqueues which are not bound to any
* specific CPU. The following iterators are similar to
* for_each_*_cpu() iterators but also considers the unbound gcwq.
* specific CPU. The following iterators are similar to for_each_*_cpu()
* iterators but also considers the unbound CPU.
*
* for_each_gcwq_cpu() : possible CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
* for_each_online_gcwq_cpu() : online CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
* for_each_wq_cpu() : possible CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
* for_each_online_wq_cpu() : online CPUs + WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
* for_each_cwq_cpu() : possible CPUs for bound workqueues,
* WORK_CPU_UNBOUND for unbound workqueues
*/
#define for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) \
for ((cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \
#define for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) \
for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
(cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3))
(cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3))
#define for_each_online_gcwq_cpu(cpu) \
for ((cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu(-1, cpu_online_mask, 3); \
#define for_each_online_wq_cpu(cpu) \
for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_online_mask, 3); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
(cpu) = __next_gcwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask, 3))
(cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask, 3))
#define for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) \
for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, (wq)); \
for ((cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, (wq)); \
(cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
(cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq)))
(cpu) = __next_cwq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, (wq)))
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
......@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static bool __need_more_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
* running workers.
*
* Note that, because unbound workers never contribute to nr_running, this
* function will always return %true for unbound gcwq as long as the
* function will always return %true for unbound pools as long as the
* worklist isn't empty.
*/
static bool need_more_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
......@@ -1129,14 +1129,14 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
}
/**
* insert_work - insert a work into gcwq
* insert_work - insert a work into a pool
* @cwq: cwq @work belongs to
* @work: work to insert
* @head: insertion point
* @extra_flags: extra WORK_STRUCT_* flags to set
*
* Insert @work which belongs to @cwq into @gcwq after @head.
* @extra_flags is or'd to work_struct flags.
* Insert @work which belongs to @cwq after @head. @extra_flags is or'd to
* work_struct flags.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
......@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int cpu;
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
struct worker_pool *pool = cwq->pool;
struct worker *worker;
......@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, jiffies + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
/*
* Sanity check nr_running. Because gcwq_unbind_fn() releases
* Sanity check nr_running. Because wq_unbind_fn() releases
* pool->lock between setting %WORKER_UNBOUND and zapping
* nr_running, the warning may trigger spuriously. Check iff
* unbind is not in progress.
......@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
}
/**
* worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind worker to its cpu if possible and lock gcwq
* worker_maybe_bind_and_lock - bind worker to its cpu if possible and lock pool
* @worker: self
*
* Works which are scheduled while the cpu is online must at least be
......@@ -1575,10 +1575,10 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* themselves to the target cpu and may race with cpu going down or
* coming online. kthread_bind() can't be used because it may put the
* worker to already dead cpu and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() can't be used
* verbatim as it's best effort and blocking and gcwq may be
* verbatim as it's best effort and blocking and pool may be
* [dis]associated in the meantime.
*
* This function tries set_cpus_allowed() and locks gcwq and verifies the
* This function tries set_cpus_allowed() and locks pool and verifies the
* binding against %POOL_DISASSOCIATED which is set during
* %CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and cleared during %CPU_ONLINE, so if the worker
* enters idle state or fetches works without dropping lock, it can
......@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static void worker_leave_idle(struct worker *worker)
* held.
*
* RETURNS:
* %true if the associated gcwq is online (@worker is successfully
* %true if the associated pool is online (@worker is successfully
* bound), %false if offline.
*/
static bool worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(struct worker *worker)
......@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
* start_worker - start a newly created worker
* @worker: worker to start
*
* Make the gcwq aware of @worker and start it.
* Make the pool aware of @worker and start it.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
......@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
* destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
* @worker: worker to be destroyed
*
* Destroy @worker and adjust @gcwq stats accordingly.
* Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly.
*
* CONTEXT:
* spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which is released and regrabbed.
......@@ -1919,7 +1919,7 @@ static bool send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
return true;
}
static void gcwq_mayday_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
static void pool_mayday_timeout(unsigned long __pool)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = (void *)__pool;
struct work_struct *work;
......@@ -2047,9 +2047,9 @@ static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
* manage_workers - manage worker pool
* @worker: self
*
* Assume the manager role and manage gcwq worker pool @worker belongs
* Assume the manager role and manage the worker pool @worker belongs
* to. At any given time, there can be only zero or one manager per
* gcwq. The exclusion is handled automatically by this function.
* pool. The exclusion is handled automatically by this function.
*
* The caller can safely start processing works on false return. On
* true return, it's guaranteed that need_to_create_worker() is false
......@@ -2092,11 +2092,11 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
* CPU hotplug could have happened while we were waiting
* for assoc_mutex. Hotplug itself can't handle us
* because manager isn't either on idle or busy list, and
* @gcwq's state and ours could have deviated.
* @pool's state and ours could have deviated.
*
* As hotplug is now excluded via assoc_mutex, we can
* simply try to bind. It will succeed or fail depending
* on @gcwq's current state. Try it and adjust
* on @pool's current state. Try it and adjust
* %WORKER_UNBOUND accordingly.
*/
if (worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker))
......@@ -2271,8 +2271,8 @@ static void process_scheduled_works(struct worker *worker)
* worker_thread - the worker thread function
* @__worker: self
*
* The gcwq worker thread function. There's a single dynamic pool of
* these per each cpu. These workers process all works regardless of
* The worker thread function. There are NR_CPU_WORKER_POOLS dynamic pools
* of these per each cpu. These workers process all works regardless of
* their specific target workqueue. The only exception is works which
* belong to workqueues with a rescuer which will be explained in
* rescuer_thread().
......@@ -2368,14 +2368,14 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__worker)
* Workqueue rescuer thread function. There's one rescuer for each
* workqueue which has WQ_RESCUER set.
*
* Regular work processing on a gcwq may block trying to create a new
* Regular work processing on a pool may block trying to create a new
* worker which uses GFP_KERNEL allocation which has slight chance of
* developing into deadlock if some works currently on the same queue
* need to be processed to satisfy the GFP_KERNEL allocation. This is
* the problem rescuer solves.
*
* When such condition is possible, the gcwq summons rescuers of all
* workqueues which have works queued on the gcwq and let them process
* When such condition is possible, the pool summons rescuers of all
* workqueues which have works queued on the pool and let them process
* those works so that forward progress can be guaranteed.
*
* This should happen rarely.
......@@ -3476,7 +3476,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
*
* There are two challenges in supporting CPU hotplug. Firstly, there
* are a lot of assumptions on strong associations among work, cwq and
* gcwq which make migrating pending and scheduled works very
* pool which make migrating pending and scheduled works very
* difficult to implement without impacting hot paths. Secondly,
* worker pools serve mix of short, long and very long running works making
* blocked draining impractical.
......@@ -3486,7 +3486,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
* cpu comes back online.
*/
static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct worker_pool *pool;
......@@ -3601,7 +3601,7 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
/* unbinding should happen on the local CPU */
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, gcwq_unbind_fn);
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, wq_unbind_fn);
queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq, &unbind_work);
flush_work(&unbind_work);
break;
......@@ -3654,7 +3654,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
*
* Start freezing workqueues. After this function returns, all freezable
* workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works list instead of
* gcwq->worklist.
* pool->worklist.
*
* CONTEXT:
* Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and pool->lock's.
......@@ -3668,7 +3668,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
BUG_ON(workqueue_freezing);
workqueue_freezing = true;
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
......@@ -3715,7 +3715,7 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
BUG_ON(!workqueue_freezing);
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
/*
* nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe
......@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
* thaw_workqueues - thaw workqueues
*
* Thaw workqueues. Normal queueing is restored and all collected
* frozen works are transferred to their respective gcwq worklists.
* frozen works are transferred to their respective pool worklists.
*
* CONTEXT:
* Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and pool->lock's.
......@@ -3757,7 +3757,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
if (!workqueue_freezing)
goto out_unlock;
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
......@@ -3801,8 +3801,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
cpu_notifier(workqueue_cpu_up_callback, CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_UP);
hotcpu_notifier(workqueue_cpu_down_callback, CPU_PRI_WORKQUEUE_DOWN);
/* initialize gcwqs */
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
/* initialize CPU pools */
for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
......@@ -3817,7 +3817,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
pool->idle_timer.function = idle_worker_timeout;
pool->idle_timer.data = (unsigned long)pool;
setup_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, gcwq_mayday_timeout,
setup_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, pool_mayday_timeout,
(unsigned long)pool);
mutex_init(&pool->assoc_mutex);
......@@ -3829,7 +3829,7 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
}
/* create the initial worker */
for_each_online_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
for_each_online_wq_cpu(cpu) {
struct worker_pool *pool;
for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册