提交 6f74651a 编写于 作者: B Baruch Even 提交者: David S. Miller

[TCP]: Seperate DSACK from SACK fast path

Move DSACK code outside the SACK fast-path checking code. If the DSACK
determined that the information was too old we stayed with a partial cache
copied. Most likely this matters very little since the next packet will not be
DSACK and we will find it in the cache. but it's still not good form and there
is little reason to couple the two checks.

Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host order we also
remove the ntohl in the checking loop.
Signed-off-by: NBaruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 fda03fbb
......@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ struct tcp_sock {
struct tcp_sack_block duplicate_sack[1]; /* D-SACK block */
struct tcp_sack_block selective_acks[4]; /* The SACKS themselves*/
struct tcp_sack_block recv_sack_cache[4];
struct tcp_sack_block_wire recv_sack_cache[4];
/* from STCP, retrans queue hinting */
struct sk_buff* lost_skb_hint;
......
......@@ -951,16 +951,43 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
tp->fackets_out = 0;
prior_fackets = tp->fackets_out;
/* Check for D-SACK. */
if (before(ntohl(sp[0].start_seq), TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->ack_seq)) {
dup_sack = 1;
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKRECV);
} else if (num_sacks > 1 &&
!after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), ntohl(sp[1].end_seq)) &&
!before(ntohl(sp[0].start_seq), ntohl(sp[1].start_seq))) {
dup_sack = 1;
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKOFORECV);
}
/* D-SACK for already forgotten data...
* Do dumb counting. */
if (dup_sack &&
!after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), prior_snd_una) &&
after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), tp->undo_marker))
tp->undo_retrans--;
/* Eliminate too old ACKs, but take into
* account more or less fresh ones, they can
* contain valid SACK info.
*/
if (before(TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->ack_seq, prior_snd_una - tp->max_window))
return 0;
/* SACK fastpath:
* if the only SACK change is the increase of the end_seq of
* the first block then only apply that SACK block
* and use retrans queue hinting otherwise slowpath */
flag = 1;
for (i = 0; i< num_sacks; i++) {
__u32 start_seq = ntohl(sp[i].start_seq);
__u32 end_seq = ntohl(sp[i].end_seq);
for (i = 0; i < num_sacks; i++) {
__be32 start_seq = sp[i].start_seq;
__be32 end_seq = sp[i].end_seq;
if (i == 0){
if (i == 0) {
if (tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq != start_seq)
flag = 0;
} else {
......@@ -970,37 +997,6 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
}
tp->recv_sack_cache[i].start_seq = start_seq;
tp->recv_sack_cache[i].end_seq = end_seq;
/* Check for D-SACK. */
if (i == 0) {
u32 ack = TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->ack_seq;
if (before(start_seq, ack)) {
dup_sack = 1;
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKRECV);
} else if (num_sacks > 1 &&
!after(end_seq, ntohl(sp[1].end_seq)) &&
!before(start_seq, ntohl(sp[1].start_seq))) {
dup_sack = 1;
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKOFORECV);
}
/* D-SACK for already forgotten data...
* Do dumb counting. */
if (dup_sack &&
!after(end_seq, prior_snd_una) &&
after(end_seq, tp->undo_marker))
tp->undo_retrans--;
/* Eliminate too old ACKs, but take into
* account more or less fresh ones, they can
* contain valid SACK info.
*/
if (before(ack, prior_snd_una - tp->max_window))
return 0;
}
}
first_sack_index = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册