提交 585457fc 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost

Pull virtio/vhost fixes from Michael Tsirkin:
 "Random fixes and cleanups that accumulated over the time"

* tag 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost:
  virtio/s390: virtio: constify virtio_config_ops structures
  virtio/s390: add missing \n to end of dev_err message
  virtio/s390: support READ_STATUS command for virtio-ccw
  tools/virtio/ringtest: tweaks for s390
  tools/virtio/ringtest: fix run-on-all.sh for offline cpus
  virtio_console: fix a crash in config_work_handler
  vhost/scsi: silence uninitialized variable warning
  vhost: scsi: constify target_core_fabric_ops structures
...@@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@ static void config_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) ...@@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@ static void config_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{ {
struct ports_device *portdev; struct ports_device *portdev;
portdev = container_of(work, struct ports_device, control_work); portdev = container_of(work, struct ports_device, config_work);
if (!use_multiport(portdev)) { if (!use_multiport(portdev)) {
struct virtio_device *vdev; struct virtio_device *vdev;
struct port *port; struct port *port;
......
...@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static struct airq_info *airq_areas[MAX_AIRQ_AREAS]; ...@@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static struct airq_info *airq_areas[MAX_AIRQ_AREAS];
#define CCW_CMD_WRITE_CONF 0x21 #define CCW_CMD_WRITE_CONF 0x21
#define CCW_CMD_WRITE_STATUS 0x31 #define CCW_CMD_WRITE_STATUS 0x31
#define CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF 0x32 #define CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF 0x32
#define CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS 0x72
#define CCW_CMD_SET_IND_ADAPTER 0x73 #define CCW_CMD_SET_IND_ADAPTER 0x73
#define CCW_CMD_SET_VIRTIO_REV 0x83 #define CCW_CMD_SET_VIRTIO_REV 0x83
...@@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static struct airq_info *airq_areas[MAX_AIRQ_AREAS]; ...@@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static struct airq_info *airq_areas[MAX_AIRQ_AREAS];
#define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND 0x04000000 #define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND 0x04000000
#define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND_ADAPTER 0x08000000 #define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND_ADAPTER 0x08000000
#define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VIRTIO_REV 0x10000000 #define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VIRTIO_REV 0x10000000
#define VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_STATUS 0x20000000
#define VIRTIO_CCW_INTPARM_MASK 0xffff0000 #define VIRTIO_CCW_INTPARM_MASK 0xffff0000
static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev) static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
...@@ -452,7 +454,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, struct ccw1 *ccw) ...@@ -452,7 +454,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, struct ccw1 *ccw)
* This may happen on device detach. * This may happen on device detach.
*/ */
if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV)) if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV))
dev_warn(&vq->vdev->dev, "Error %d while deleting queue %d", dev_warn(&vq->vdev->dev, "Error %d while deleting queue %d\n",
ret, index); ret, index);
vring_del_virtqueue(vq); vring_del_virtqueue(vq);
...@@ -892,6 +894,28 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_config(struct virtio_device *vdev, ...@@ -892,6 +894,28 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
static u8 virtio_ccw_get_status(struct virtio_device *vdev) static u8 virtio_ccw_get_status(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{ {
struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev); struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
u8 old_status = *vcdev->status;
struct ccw1 *ccw;
if (vcdev->revision < 1)
return *vcdev->status;
ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ccw)
return old_status;
ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS;
ccw->flags = 0;
ccw->count = sizeof(*vcdev->status);
ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)vcdev->status;
ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_STATUS);
/*
* If the channel program failed (should only happen if the device
* was hotunplugged, and then we clean up via the machine check
* handler anyway), vcdev->status was not overwritten and we just
* return the old status, which is fine.
*/
kfree(ccw);
return *vcdev->status; return *vcdev->status;
} }
...@@ -920,7 +944,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status) ...@@ -920,7 +944,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
kfree(ccw); kfree(ccw);
} }
static struct virtio_config_ops virtio_ccw_config_ops = { static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_ccw_config_ops = {
.get_features = virtio_ccw_get_features, .get_features = virtio_ccw_get_features,
.finalize_features = virtio_ccw_finalize_features, .finalize_features = virtio_ccw_finalize_features,
.get = virtio_ccw_get_config, .get = virtio_ccw_get_config,
...@@ -987,6 +1011,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_check_activity(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev, ...@@ -987,6 +1011,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_check_activity(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_CONFIG: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_CONFIG:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_CONFIG: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_CONFIG:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_STATUS:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VQ: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_VQ:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND:
case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND: case VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_CONF_IND:
......
...@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) ...@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
struct iov_iter out_iter, in_iter, prot_iter, data_iter; struct iov_iter out_iter, in_iter, prot_iter, data_iter;
u64 tag; u64 tag;
u32 exp_data_len, data_direction; u32 exp_data_len, data_direction;
unsigned out, in; unsigned int out = 0, in = 0;
int head, ret, prot_bytes; int head, ret, prot_bytes;
size_t req_size, rsp_size = sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp); size_t req_size, rsp_size = sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp);
size_t out_size, in_size; size_t out_size, in_size;
...@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *vhost_scsi_wwn_attrs[] = { ...@@ -2087,7 +2087,7 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *vhost_scsi_wwn_attrs[] = {
NULL, NULL,
}; };
static struct target_core_fabric_ops vhost_scsi_ops = { static const struct target_core_fabric_ops vhost_scsi_ops = {
.module = THIS_MODULE, .module = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "vhost", .name = "vhost",
.get_fabric_name = vhost_scsi_get_fabric_name, .get_fabric_name = vhost_scsi_get_fabric_name,
......
...@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ static inline void wait_cycles(unsigned long long cycles) ...@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ static inline void wait_cycles(unsigned long long cycles)
#define VMEXIT_CYCLES 500 #define VMEXIT_CYCLES 500
#define VMENTRY_CYCLES 500 #define VMENTRY_CYCLES 500
#elif defined(__s390x__)
static inline void wait_cycles(unsigned long long cycles)
{
asm volatile("0: brctg %0,0b" : : "d" (cycles));
}
/* tweak me */
#define VMEXIT_CYCLES 200
#define VMENTRY_CYCLES 200
#else #else
static inline void wait_cycles(unsigned long long cycles) static inline void wait_cycles(unsigned long long cycles)
{ {
...@@ -81,6 +91,8 @@ extern unsigned ring_size; ...@@ -81,6 +91,8 @@ extern unsigned ring_size;
/* Is there a portable way to do this? */ /* Is there a portable way to do this? */
#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__)
#define cpu_relax() asm ("rep; nop" ::: "memory") #define cpu_relax() asm ("rep; nop" ::: "memory")
#elif defined(__s390x__)
#define cpu_relax() barrier()
#else #else
#define cpu_relax() assert(0) #define cpu_relax() assert(0)
#endif #endif
......
#!/bin/sh #!/bin/sh
CPUS_ONLINE=$(lscpu --online -p=cpu|grep -v -e '#')
#use last CPU for host. Why not the first? #use last CPU for host. Why not the first?
#many devices tend to use cpu0 by default so #many devices tend to use cpu0 by default so
#it tends to be busier #it tends to be busier
HOST_AFFINITY=$(lscpu -p=cpu | tail -1) HOST_AFFINITY=$(echo "${CPUS_ONLINE}"|tail -n 1)
#run command on all cpus #run command on all cpus
for cpu in $(seq 0 $HOST_AFFINITY) for cpu in $CPUS_ONLINE
do do
#Don't run guest and host on same CPU #Don't run guest and host on same CPU
#It actually works ok if using signalling #It actually works ok if using signalling
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册