提交 5301a77d 编写于 作者: L Louis Rilling 提交者: Mark Fasheh

configfs: Protect configfs_dirent s_links list mutations

Symlinks to a config_item are listed under its configfs_dirent s_links, but the
list mutations are not protected by any common lock.

This patch uses the configfs_dirent_lock spinlock to add the necessary
protection.

Note: we should also protect the list_empty() test in configfs_detach_prep() but
1/ the lock should not be released immediately because nothing would prevent the
list from being filled after a successful list_empty() test, making the problem
tricky,
2/ this will be solved by the rmdir() vs rename() deadlock bugfix.
Signed-off-by: NLouis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
上级 6f610764
...@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@ ...@@ -37,10 +37,11 @@
DECLARE_RWSEM(configfs_rename_sem); DECLARE_RWSEM(configfs_rename_sem);
/* /*
* Protects mutations of configfs_dirent linkage together with proper i_mutex * Protects mutations of configfs_dirent linkage together with proper i_mutex
* Also protects mutations of symlinks linkage to target configfs_dirent
* Mutators of configfs_dirent linkage must *both* have the proper inode locked * Mutators of configfs_dirent linkage must *both* have the proper inode locked
* and configfs_dirent_lock locked, in that order. * and configfs_dirent_lock locked, in that order.
* This allows one to safely traverse configfs_dirent trees without having to * This allows one to safely traverse configfs_dirent trees and symlinks without
* lock inodes. * having to lock inodes.
*/ */
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(configfs_dirent_lock); DEFINE_SPINLOCK(configfs_dirent_lock);
......
...@@ -77,12 +77,15 @@ static int create_link(struct config_item *parent_item, ...@@ -77,12 +77,15 @@ static int create_link(struct config_item *parent_item,
sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct configfs_symlink), GFP_KERNEL); sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct configfs_symlink), GFP_KERNEL);
if (sl) { if (sl) {
sl->sl_target = config_item_get(item); sl->sl_target = config_item_get(item);
/* FIXME: needs a lock, I'd bet */ spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
list_add(&sl->sl_list, &target_sd->s_links); list_add(&sl->sl_list, &target_sd->s_links);
spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
ret = configfs_create_link(sl, parent_item->ci_dentry, ret = configfs_create_link(sl, parent_item->ci_dentry,
dentry); dentry);
if (ret) { if (ret) {
spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
list_del_init(&sl->sl_list); list_del_init(&sl->sl_list);
spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
config_item_put(item); config_item_put(item);
kfree(sl); kfree(sl);
} }
...@@ -186,8 +189,9 @@ int configfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) ...@@ -186,8 +189,9 @@ int configfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
type->ct_item_ops->drop_link(parent_item, type->ct_item_ops->drop_link(parent_item,
sl->sl_target); sl->sl_target);
/* FIXME: Needs lock */ spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
list_del_init(&sl->sl_list); list_del_init(&sl->sl_list);
spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
/* Put reference from create_link() */ /* Put reference from create_link() */
config_item_put(sl->sl_target); config_item_put(sl->sl_target);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册